Replication in Psychological Science

Association for Psychological Science. (2015). APS commits to promoting transparent science. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/obsonline/aps-commits-to-promoting-transparent-science.html

Association for Psychological Science. (n.d.). Registered Replication Reports. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/replication

Begley C. G. Ellis L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531–533. doi:10.1038/483531a

Bollen K. Cacioppo J. T. Kaplan R. M. Krosnick J. A. Olds J. L. (2015). Social, behavioral, and economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science: Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science, Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. Retrieved from the National Science Foundation Web site: www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_Research_Report.pdf

Center for Open Science. (2011–2015). Guidelines for transparency and openness promotion (TOP) in journal policies and practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/ud578/

Cohen J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153. doi:10.1037/h0045186

Cumming G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Cumming G. (2014). The new statistics: Estimation and research integrity. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/members/new-statistics#p2

Eich E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3–6.

Francis G. (2012). Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 975–991. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0322-y

Francis G. (2014). The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1180–1187. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x

Gelman A. Stern H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. American Statistician, 60, 328–331.

Hofer S. M. Piccinin A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150–164. doi:10.1037/a0015566

Hoffman L. Rovine M. J. (2007). Multilevel models for experimental psychologists: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 101–117.

JASP . (2014). Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/

Masson M. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5

Maxwell S. E. Lau M. Y. Howard G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0039400

Nosek B. A. Alter G. Banks G. C. Borsboom D. Bowman S. D. Breckler S. J. . . . Yarkoni T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science, 348, 1422–1425. doi:10.1126/science.aab2374

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716

Replication-Index. (2015). Replicability report for PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. Retrieved from https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/replicability-report-for-psychological-science/

Sanborn A. N. Hills T. T. (2014). The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 283–300. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0518-9

Schönbrodt F. D. Perugini M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009

Simmons J. P. Nelson L. D. Simonsohn U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632

Stroebe W. Strack F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450

Vankov I. Bowers J. Munafò M. R. (2014). On the persistence of low power in psychological science. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1037–1040. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.885986

Vazire S. (2015). Editorial. Social Psychological & Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550615603955

Westfall J. Kenny D. A. Judd C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020–2045. doi:10.1037/xge0000014

Wikipedia. (2015). Anscombe’s quartet. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anscombe%27s_quartet