Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present research examined whether a communicator’s verbal, implicit message regarding a target is used as a cue for inferring that communicator’s social identity. Previous research has found linguistic intergroup bias (LIB) in individuals’ speech: They use abstract language to describe in-group targets’ desirable behaviors and concrete language to describe their undesirable behaviors (favorable LIB), but use concrete language for out-group targets’ desirable behaviors and abstract language for their undesirable behaviors (unfavorable LIB). Consequently, one can infer the type of language a communicator is likely to use to describe in-group and out-group targets. We hypothesized and found evidence for the reverse inference. Across four studies, individuals inferred a communicator’s social identity on the basis of the communicator’s use of an LIB. Specifically, participants more strongly believed that a communicator and target shared a social identity when the communicator used the favorable, rather than the unfavorable, LIB in describing that target.

Keywords

social cognition social perception attitudes intergroup dynamics language open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambady

Bernieri

Richeson

J. A.

(2000). Towards a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of behavior. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Assilaméhou

Lepastourel

Testé

(2013). How the Linguistic Intergroup Bias affects group perception: Effects of language abstraction on generalization to the group. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 98–108.

Assilaméhou

Testé

(2012). The effects of linguistic abstraction on evaluations of the speaker in an intergroup context: Using the Linguistic Intergroup Bias makes you a good group member. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 113–119.

Bargh

J. A.

(1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. Unintended Thought, 3, 51–69.

Beukeboom

C. J.

(2014). Mechanisms of linguistic bias: How words reflect and maintain stereotypic expectancies. In Laszlo

Forgas

Vincze

(Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 313–330). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Brewer

M. B.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2008). Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorization. In Brown

Gaertner

S. L.

(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 451–472). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Cialdini

R. B.

(1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins College.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

(2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682–696.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

(2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 500–508.

10.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

(2010). By their words ye shall know them: Language abstraction and the likeability of describers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 366–374.

11.

Douglas

K. M.

Sutton

R. M.

McGarty

(2008). Strategic language use in interpersonal and intergroup communication. In Kashima

Fiedler

Freytag

(Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

12.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

13.

Fiedler

(Ed.). (2007). Social communication. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

14.

Foddy

Platow

M. J.

Yamagishi

(2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20, 419–422.

15.

Giles

Coupland

(1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Haslam

S. A.

McGarty

Turner

J. C.

(1996). Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs. In Nye

J. L.

Brower

A. M.

(Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on social-shared cognition in small groups (pp. 29–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Higgins

E. T.

Rholes

W. S.

Jones

C. R.

(1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.

18.

Hogg

M. A.

Reid

S. A.

(2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7–30.

19.

Lynn

(1989). Scarcity effects on desirability: Mediated by assumed expensiveness? Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 257–274.

20.

Maass

(1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79–121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

21.

Maass

Ceccarelli

Rudin

(1996). The linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512–526.

22.

Maass

Salvi

Arcuri

Semin

G. R.

(1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981–993.

23.

Reitsma-van Rooijen

Semin

G. R.

van Leeuwen

(2007). The effect of linguistic abstraction on interpersonal distance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 817–823.

24.

Scherer

K. R.

Giles

(Eds.). (1979). Social markers in speech. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Semin

G. R.

de Poot

C. J.

(1997). The question-answer paradigm: You might regret not noticing how a question is worded. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 472–480.

26.

Semin

G. R.

Fiedler

(1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568.

27.

St. Clair

R. N.

Giles

(Eds.). (1980). The social and psychological contexts of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

Douglas

K. M.

(2007). Language, expectancies and intergroup relations. In Fiedler

(Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

29.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

Semin

G. R.

Spears

(2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5–18.

30.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

Spears

Semin

G. R.

(2005). When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 215–230.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

0.14 MB

Inferring Identity From Language

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material