People often fail to muster the motivation needed to initiate goal pursuit. Across five laboratory experiments, we explored occasions when people naturally experience enhanced motivation to take actions that facilitate goal pursuit and why certain dates are more likely to spur goal initiation than others. We present causal evidence that emphasizing a temporal landmark denoting the beginning of a new time period increases people’s intentions to initiate goal pursuit. In addition, we propose and show that people’s strengthened motivation to begin pursuing their aspirations following such temporal landmarks originates in part from the psychological disassociation these landmarks induce from a person’s past, imperfect self.
AlterA. L.HershfieldH. E. (2014). People search for meaning when they approach a new decade in chronological age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 17066–17070. doi:10.1073/pnas.1415086111
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
4.
BartelsD. M.RipsL. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49–69. doi:10.1037/a0018062
5.
BurrisC. T.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Distorted distance estimation induced by a self-relevant national boundary. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 305–312. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.012
6.
ChapmanG. B.ColbyH. A.ConveryK.CoupsE. J. (2014). Goals and social comparisons promote walking behavior. Medical Decision Making. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0272989X15592156
7.
CialdiniR. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
8.
CochranW.TesserA. (1996). The “what the hell” effect: Some effects of goal proximity and goal framing on performance. In MartinL. L.TesserA. (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 99–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
9.
ColbyH.ChapmanG. B. (2013). Savings, subgoals, and reference points. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 16–24.
10.
CryderC. E.LoewensteinG.ScheinesR. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 15–23.
FestingerL. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
FishbachA.FergusonM. J. (2007). The goal construct in social psychology. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 490–515). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
KarlanD.McConnellM.MullainathanS.ZinmanJ. (in press). Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Science.
16.
KrayL. J.GeorgeL. G.LiljenquistK. A.GalinskyA. D.TetlockP. E.RoeseN. J. (2010). From what might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 106–118.
17.
LeBoeufR. A.WilliamsE. F.BrennerL. A. (2014). Forceful phantom firsts: Framing experiences as firsts amplifies their influence on judgment. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 420–432.
18.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2002). Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 167–179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.167
19.
LiuW. (2008). Focusing on desirability: The effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 640–652.
20.
MishraA.MishraH. (2010). Border bias: The belief that state borders can protect against disasters. Psychological Science, 21, 1582–1586. doi:10.1177/0956797610385950
21.
PeetzJ.WilsonA. E. (2013). The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 249–266. doi:10.1037/A0030477
22.
PeetzJ.WilsonA. E. (2014). Marking time: Selective use of temporal landmarks as barriers between current and future selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 44–56. doi:10.1177/0146167213501559
23.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
24.
RobinsonJ. A. (1986). Temporal reference systems and autobiographical memory. In RubinD. C. (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 159–188). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RossM.WilsonA. E. (2000). Constructing and appraising past selves. In SchacterD. L.ScarryE. (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 231–258). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
SchmidtA. M.DeShonR. P. (2010). The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 572–581.
SchwartzJ.MochonD.WyperL.MarobaJ.PatelD.ArielyD. (2014). Healthier by precommitment. Psychological Science, 25, 538–546. doi:10.1177/0956797613510950
29.
ShumM. S. (1998). The role of temporal landmarks in autobiographical memory processes. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 423–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.423
30.
SmithI. H. (2014). The disruption model of inspiration: Toward a general model of “being inspired to act” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
31.
SomanD.CheemaA. (2004). When goals are counterproductive: The effects of violation of a behavioral goal on subsequent performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 52–62.
32.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572–584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.572
35.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11, 137–149. doi:10.1080/09658210244000324
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
