BaumeisterR. F.TwengeJ. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2012). Sexual economics, culture, men, and modern sexual trends. Society, 49, 520–524.
4.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561.
5.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.
6.
RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C. (2014). Gender and sexual economics: Do women view sex as a female commodity?Psychological Science, 25, 1438–1447.
7.
RudmanL. A.FetterolfJ. C.SanchezD. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 251–263.
8.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (2015). Correcting some misrepresentations about gender and sexual economics theory: Comment on Rudman and Fetterolf (2014). Psychological Science, 26, 1522–1523.
