Concreteness and Psychological Distance in Natural Language Use

Abstract

Existing evidence shows that more abstract mental representations are formed and more abstract language is used to characterize phenomena that are more distant from the self. Yet the precise form of the functional relationship between distance and linguistic abstractness is unknown. In four studies, we tested whether more abstract language is used in textual references to more geographically distant cities (Study 1), time points further into the past or future (Study 2), references to more socially distant people (Study 3), and references to a specific topic (Study 4). Using millions of linguistic productions from thousands of social-media users, we determined that linguistic concreteness is a curvilinear function of the logarithm of distance, and we discuss psychological underpinnings of the mathematical properties of this relationship. We also demonstrated that gradient curvilinear effects of geographic and temporal distance on concreteness are nearly identical, which suggests uniformity in representation of abstractness along multiple dimensions.

Keywords

psychological distance construal-level theory embodied cognition social media Twitter abstraction concreteness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alter

A. L.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

(2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161–167.

Amit

Greene

J. D.

(2012). You see, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 23, 861–868.

Bar-Anan

Liberman

Trope

Algom

(2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622.

Barsalou

L. W.

(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Bogardus

E. S.

(1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271.

Boroditsky

(2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.

Boroditsky

(2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.

Boroditsky

Ramscar

(2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.

Brysbaert

Warriner

A. B.

Kuperman

(2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911.

10.

Burgoon

E. M.

Henderson

M. D.

Markman

A. B.

(2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501–520.

11.

Central Intelligence Agency. (2014). The World Factbook: North America: United States. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html

12.

D’Argembeau

Van der Linden

(2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858.

13.

Eisenstein

(in press). Written dialect variation in online social media. In Boberg

Nerbonne

Watt

(Eds.), Handbook of dialectology. New York, NY: Wiley.

14.

Eyal

Liberman

Trope

Walther

(2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 781–795.

15.

Fiedler

(2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 101–106.

16.

Fischer

M. H.

Zwaan

R. A.

(2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.

17.

Fujita

Henderson

M. D.

Eng

Trope

Liberman

(2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282.

18.

Gallese

Lakoff

(2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.

19.

Gong

Medin

D. L.

(2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 628–638.

20.

Hansen

Wanke

(2010). Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1576–1588.

21.

Hirst

Phelps

E. A.

Meksin

Vaidya

C. J.

Johnson

M. K.

Mitchell

K. J.

. . . Olsson

(2015). A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 604–623.

22.

Johnson

M. K.

Foley

M. A.

Suengas

A. G.

Raye

C. L.

(1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.

23.

Kahle

Wickham

(2013). ggmap: Spatial visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal, 5(1), 144–161. Retrieved from http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2013-1/kahle-wickham.pdf

24.

Ledgerwood

Trope

Chaiken

(2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 32–51.

25.

Liviatan

Trope

Liberman

(2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269.

26.

Meteyard

Cuadrado

S. R.

Bahrami

Vigliocco

(2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804.

27.

Nisbett

R. E.

Caputo

Legant

Marecek

(1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.

28.

Paivio

(1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

29.

Parrillo

V. N.

Donoghue

(2005). Updating the Bogardus social distance studies: A new national survey. The Social Science Journal, 42, 257–271.

30.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Paez

Rim

(2013). Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

31.

Pingdom. (2014). Report: Social network demographics in 2012. Retrieved from http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/08/21/report-social-network-demographics-in-2012/

32.

R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

33.

Robinson

W. S.

(1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.

34.

Schacter

D. L.

Addis

D. R.

Buckner

R. L.

(2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.

35.

Schwanenflugel

P. J.

Harnishfeger

K. K.

Stowe

R. W.

(1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499–520.

36.

Semin

G. R.

Fiedler

(1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568.

37.

Shaoul

Westbury

(2013). A reduced redundancy USENET corpus (2005–2011). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/usenetcorpus.download.html

38.

Soderberg

C. K.

Callahan

S. P.

Kochersberger

A. O.

Amit

Ledgerwood

(2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 525–548.

39.

Stephan

Liberman

Trope

(2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268–280.

40.

Trope

Liberman

(2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876–889.

41.

Trope

Liberman

(2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.

42.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.

43.

Wakslak

C. J.

Trope

Liberman

Alony

(2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641–653.