What influences how people feel about and behave toward their romantic partners? Extending beyond features of the partners, relationship experiences, and social context, the current research examines whether benign, relationship-irrelevant factors—such as one’s somatic experiences—can influence relationship perceptions and interpersonal behavior. Drawing on the embodiment literature, we propose that experiencing physical instability can undermine perceptions of relationship stability. Participants who experienced physical instability by sitting at a wobbly workstation rather than a stable workstation (Study 1), standing on one foot rather than two (Study 2), or sitting on an inflatable seat cushion rather than a rigid one (Study 3) perceived their romantic relationships to be less likely to last. Results were consistent with risk-regulation theory: Perceptions of relational instability were associated with reporting lower relationship quality (Studies 1–3) and expressing less affection toward the partner (Studies 2 and 3). These findings indicate that benign physical experiences can influence perceptions of relationship stability, exerting downstream effects on consequential relationship processes.
BaldwinM. W.SinclairL. (1996). Self-esteem and if-then contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130–1141.
2.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
3.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
4.
BerscheidE.ReganP. C. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
5.
CavalloJ. V.HolmesJ. G.FitzsimonsG. M.MurrayS. L.WoodJ. V. (2012). Managing motivational conflict: How self-esteem and executive resources influence self-regulatory responses to risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 430–451. doi:10.1037/a0028821
6.
ClarkM. S.FitnessJ.BrissetteI. (2001). Understanding people’s perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 253–278). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
7.
DuttonD. G.AronA. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517. doi:10.1037/h0037031
ForestA. L.WoodJ. V. (2011). When partner caring leads to sharing: Partner responsiveness increases expressivity, but only for individuals with low self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 843–848. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.005
10.
GaucherD.WoodJ. V.StinsonD. A.ForestA. L.HolmesJ. G.LogelC. (2012). Perceived regard explains self-esteem differences in expressivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1144–1156. doi:10.1177/0146167212445790
11.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
HuangX.DongP.DaiX.WyerR. S.Jr. (2012). Going my way? The benefits of travelling in the same direction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 978–981.
13.
ImpettE. A.BealsK. P.PeplauL. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312–326. doi:10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3
14.
JaremkaL. M.BunyanD. P.CollinsN. L.ShermanD. K. (2011). Reducing defensive distancing: Self-affirmation and risk regulation in response to relationship threats. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 264–268. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.015
15.
KilleD. R.ForestA. L.WoodJ. V. (2013). Tall, dark, and stable: Embodiment motivates mate selection preferences. Psychological Science, 24, 112–114. doi:10.1177/0956797612457392
16.
LandauM. J.MeierB. P.KeeferL. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067. doi:10.1037/a0020970
17.
LomoreC. D.SpencerS. J.HolmesJ. G. (2007). The role of shared-values affirmation in enhancing the feelings of low self-esteem women about their relationships. Self and Identity, 6, 340–360. doi:10.1080/15298860601109487
18.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ. G.RossM. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–248. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.232
19.
MeierB. P.SchnallS.SchwarzN.BarghJ. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705–716. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x
20.
MurrayS. L.AloniM.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ. L.StinsonD. A.LederS. (2009). Fostering partner dependence as trust insurance: The implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 324–348. doi:10.1037/a0012856
21.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
22.
MurrayS. L.GomillionS.HolmesJ. G.HarrisB.LamarcheV. (2013). The dynamics of relationship promotion: Controlling the automatic inclination to trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 305–334. doi:10.1037/a0030513
23.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (2011). Interdependent minds: The dynamics of close relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.AloniM.PinkusR. T.DerrickJ. L.LederS. (2009). Commitment insurance: Compensating for the autonomy costs of interdependence in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 256–278. doi:10.1037/a0014562
25.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.MacDonaldG.EllsworthP. C. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1459
26.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556–573. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.556
27.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A. (2013). Motivated to “forget”: The effects of in-group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 730–737. doi:10.1177/1948550613482986
28.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
29.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
30.
SimpsonJ. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.683
31.
SprecherS. (1987). The effects of self-disclosure given and received on affection for an intimate partner and stability of the relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 115–127. doi:10.1177/0265407587042001
32.
SprecherS.HendrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
33.
StroebeW.StrackF. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71. doi:10.-1177/1745691613514450
34.
Van HorenF.MussweilerT. (2014). Soft assurance: Coping with uncertainty through haptic sensations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.008
WilliamsL. E.HuangJ. Y.BarghJ. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1257–1267. doi:10.1002/ejsp.665
37.
WoodyE. Z. (2011). An SEM perspective on evaluating mediation: What every clinical researcher needs to know. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2, 210–251. doi:10.5127/jep.010410
38.
ZhangY.RisenJ. L. (2014). Embodied motivation: Using a goal systems framework to understand the preference for social and physical warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 965–977. doi:10.1037/a0038153
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
