Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Distributing the spoils of a joint enterprise on the basis of work contribution or relative productivity seems natural to the modern Western mind. But such notions of merit-based distributive justice may be culturally constructed norms that vary with the social and economic structure of a group. In the present research, we showed that children from three different cultures have very different ideas about distributive justice. Whereas children from a modern Western society distributed the spoils of a joint enterprise precisely in proportion to productivity, children from a gerontocratic pastoralist society in Africa did not take merit into account at all. Children from a partially hunter-gatherer, egalitarian African culture distributed the spoils more equally than did the other two cultures, with merit playing only a limited role. This pattern of results suggests that some basic notions of distributive justice are not universal intuitions of the human species but rather culturally constructed behavioral norms.

Keywords

cross-cultural differences morality distributive justice equity children peer interactions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

(1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

Almås

Cappelen

A. W.

Sørensen

E. Ø.

Tungodden

(2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328, 1176–1178.

Baayen

R. H.

(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.0-5) [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

Baumard

Mascaro

Chevallier

(2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology, 48, 492–498.

Cappelen

A. W.

Sørensen

E. Ø.

Tungodden

(2010). Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. European Economic Review, 54, 429–441.

Carson

A. S.

Banuazizi

(2008). “That’s not fair”: Similarities and differences in distributive justice reasoning between American and Filipino children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 493–514.

Chudek

Henrich

(2011). Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218–226.

Damon

(1977). The social world of the child. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Dawes

C. T.

Fowler

J. H.

Johnson

McElreath

Smirnov

(2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446, 794–796.

11.

Dobson

A. J.

(2010). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

12.

Fehr

Gächter

(2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159–181.

13.

Fischer

Smith

P. B.

(2003). Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251–268.

14.

Forstmeier

Schielzeth

(2011). Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: Overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 47–55.

15.

Frohlich

Oppenheimer

Kurki

(2004). Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice, 119, 91–117.

16.

Gurven

(2004). To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 543–559.

17.

Gurven

Winking

(2008). Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist, 110, 179–190.

18.

Hamann

Bender

Tomasello

(2014). Meritocratic sharing is based on collaboration in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 50, 121–128.

19.

Henrich

Ensminger

McElreath

Barr

Barrett

Bolyanatz

. . . Ziker

(2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484.

20.

Hook

Cook

T. D.

(1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 429–445.

21.

House

B. R.

Silk

J. B.

Henrich

Barrett

H. C.

Scelza

B. A.

Boyette

A. H.

. . . Laurence

(2013). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 14586–14591.

22.

Kanngiesser

Warneken

(2012). Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others. PLoS ONE, 7(8), Article e43979. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043979

23.

Lane

I. M.

Coon

R. C.

(1972). Reward allocation in preschool children. Child Development, 43, 1382–1389.

24.

Lesorogol

C. K.

(2005). Experiments and ethnography: Combining methods for better understanding of behavior and change. Current Anthropology, 46, 129–136.

25.

Marshall

Swift

Routh

Burgoyne

(1999). What is and what ought to be: Popular beliefs about distributive justice in thirteen countries. European Sociological Review, 15, 349–367.

26.

McCullagh

Nelder

J. A.

(2008). Generalized linear models. London, England: Chapman & Hall.

27.

Miller

C. E.

Komorita

S. S.

(1995). Reward allocation in task-performing groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 80–90.

28.

Murphy-Berman

Berman

J. J.

Singh

Pachauri

Kumar

(1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1267–1272.

29.

Nisan

(1984). Distributive justice and social norms. Child Development, 55, 1020–1029.

30.

Oxoby

R. J.

Spraggon

(2008). Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 703–713. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.12.006

31.

Rawls

(1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

32.

R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/

33.

Robinson

P. H.

Kurzban

Jones

O. D.

(2007). The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, 1633–1688.

34.

Rochat

Dias

M. D. G.

Liping

Broesch

Passos-Ferreira

Winning

Berg

(2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3- and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 416–442.

35.

Spencer

(2004). The Samburu: A study of gerontocracy. London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1965)

36.

Venables

W. N.

Ripley

B. D.

(2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

37.

Widlok

(1999). Living on Mangetti: ‘Bushman’ autonomy and Namibian independence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

38.

Woodburn

(1982). Egalitarian societies. Man, 17, 431–451.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material