Approach and avoidance constitute a basic dimension of all animal behavior. Although a large number of studies have investigated approach and avoidance elicited by specific sensory stimuli, comparatively little is known about default approach biases when stimulus information is absent or reduced. The amygdala is well known to contribute to approach and avoidance behaviors in response to specific sensory stimuli; we tested whether the amygdala’s role might extend to situations in which stimulus information is reduced. In a novel task, 3 patients with rare bilateral amygdala lesions (and control subjects) made approach-related judgments about photos of intact faces and of the same faces with all internal facial features occluded. Direct comparisons of the judgments of these stimuli isolated a default bias. The patients showed a greater tendency than the control subjects to rate occluded faces as more approachable than whole faces. These findings suggest that the amygdala’s role in approach behavior extends beyond responses to specific stimuli.
AdamsR. B.GordonH. L.BairdA. A.AmbadyN.KleckR. E. (2003). Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science, 300, 1536.
2.
AdolphsR.GosselinF.BuchananT. W.TranelD.SchynsP.DamasioA. R. (2005). A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature, 433, 68–72.
3.
AdolphsR.TranelD.DamasioA. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393, 470–474.
4.
AdolphsR.TranelD.DamasioH.DamasioA. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372, 669–672.
5.
AdolphsR.TranelD.HamannS.YoungA.CalderA.AndersonA.. . . DamasioA. R. (1999). Recognition of facial emotion in nine subjects with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1111–1117.
6.
AmaralD. G.PriceJ. L.PitkänenA.CarmichaelS. T. (1992). Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In AggletonJ. P. (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 1–66). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss.
7.
AndersonA. K.ChristoffK.StappenI.PanitzD.GhahremaniD. G.GloverG.. . . SobelN. (2003). Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 196–202.
8.
AppenzellerS.ChaloultE.VelhoP.de SouzaE. M.AraujoV. Z.CendesF.LiL. M. (2006). Amygdalae calcifications associated with disease duration in lipoid proteinosis. Journal of Neuroimaging, 16, 154–156.
9.
Baron-CohenS.RingH. A.BullmoreE. T.WheelwrightS.AshwinC.WilliamsS. C. R. (2000). The amygdala theory of autism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 355–364.
10.
BeckerB.MihovY.ScheeleD.KendrickK. M.FeinsteinJ. S.MatuschA.. . . HurlemannR. (2012). Fear processing and social networking in the absence of a functional amygdala. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 70–77.
11.
BlanchardD. C.GriebelG.PobbeR.BlanchardR. J. (2011). Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 991–998.
12.
BroksP.YoungA. W.MaratosE. J.CoffeyP. J.CalderA. J.IsaacC.. . . HadleyD. (1998). Face processing impairments after encephalitis: Amygdala damage and recognition of fear. Neuropsychologia, 36, 59–70.
13.
CastelliF.FrithC.HappéF.FrithU. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 1839–1849.
14.
ChoiJ.KimJ. J. (2010). Amygdala regulates risk of predation in rats foraging in a dynamic fear environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 21773–21777.
15.
CunninghamW. A.BroschT. (2012). Motivational salience: Amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 54–59.
16.
DaltonK. M.NacewiczB. M.JohnstoneT.SchaeferH. S.GernsbacherM. A.GoldsmithH. H.. . . DavidsonR. J. (2005). Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 519–526.
17.
DavisM. (1992). The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 353–375.
18.
DavisM.WhalenP. J. (2001). The amygdala: Vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 13–34.
19.
ElliotA. J.EderA. B.Harmon-JonesE. (2013). Approach-avoidance motivation and emotion: Convergence and divergence. Emotion Review, 5, 308–311.
20.
EtkinA.WagerT. D. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: A meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1476–1488.
21.
FeinsteinJ. S.AdolphsR.DamasioA.TranelD. (2011). The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Current Biology, 21, 34–38.
22.
FreeseJ. L.AmaralD. G. (2009). Neuroanatomy of the primate amygdala. In WhalenP. J.PhelpsE. A. (Eds.), The human amygdala (pp. 3–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
GothardK. M.BattagliaF. P.EricksonC. A.SpitlerK. M.AmaralD. G. (2007). Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 1671–1683.
24.
HamannS. B.ElyT. D.HoffmanJ. M.KiltsC. D. (2002). Ecstasy and agony: Activation of the human amygdala in positive and negative emotion. Psychological Science, 13, 135–141.
HarrisonL.AdolphsR. (2015). The amygdala and social perception. In TogaA. W. (Ed.), Brain mapping (pp. 91–96). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
27.
HatfieldT.HanJ.-S.ConleyM.GallagherM.HollandP. (1996). Neurotoxic lesions of basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second-order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5256–5265.
28.
HerryC.BachD. R.EspositoF.Di SalleF.PerrigW. J.SchefflerK.SeifritzE. (2007). Processing of temporal unpredictability in human and animal amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5958–5966.
29.
HoferP. A. (1973). Urbach-Wiethe disease (lipoglycoproteinosis; lipoid proteinosis; hyalinosis cutis et mucosae): A review. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Supplementum, 53, 1–52.
30.
HsuM.BhattM.AdolphsR.TranelD.CamererC. F. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310, 1680–1683.
31.
IzquierdoA.MurrayE. A. (2007). Selective bilateral amygdala lesions in rhesus monkeys fail to disrupt object reversal learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1054–1062.
32.
KennedyD. P.GläscherJ.TyszkaJ. M.AdolphsR. (2009). Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1226–1227.
33.
KlüverH.BucyP. C. (1939). Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 42, 979–1000.
34.
MálkováL.GaffanD.MurrayE. A. (1997). Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 6011–6020.
35.
McNaughtonN.CorrP. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305.
36.
MurrayE. A.IzquierdoA.MalkovaL. (2009). Amygdala function in positive reinforcement: Contributions from studies of nonhuman primates. In WhalenP. J.PhelpsE. A. (Eds.), The human amygdala (pp. 82–104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
NorrisC. J.GollanJ.BerntsonG. G.CacioppoJ. T. (2010). The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space. Biological Psychology, 84, 422–436.
38.
PerrettD. I.RollsE. T.CaanW. (1982). Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329–342.
39.
RutishauserU.TudusciucO.NeumannD.MamelakA.HellerA. C.RossI. B.. . . AdolphsR. (2011). Single-unit responses selective for whole faces in the human amygdala. Current Biology, 21, 1654–1660.
40.
SanderD.GrafmanJ.ZallaT. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14, 303–316.
SiebertM.MarkowitschH. J.BartelP. (2003). Amygdala, affect and cognition: Evidence from 10 patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease. Brain, 126, 2627–2637.
43.
SinhaP.BalasB.OstrovskyY.RussellR. (2006). Face recognition by humans: Nineteen results all computer vision researchers should know about. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94, 1948–1962.
44.
SomervilleL. H.KimH.JohnstoneT.AlexanderA. L.WhalenP. J. (2004). Human amygdala responses during presentation of happy and neutral faces: Correlations with state anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 897–903.
45.
SpezioL.HuangP. S.CastelliF.AdolphsR. (2007). Amygdala damage impairs eye contact during conversations with real people. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3994–3997.
46.
TsaoD. Y.FreiwaldW. A.TootellR. B. H.LivingstoneM. S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670–674.
47.
van der ZwaagW.Da CostaS. E.ZürcherN. R.AdamsR. B.Jr.HadjikhaniN. (2012). A 7 tesla fMRI study of amygdala responses to fearful faces. Brain Topography, 25, 125–128.
48.
van HonkJ.TerburgD.ThorntonH.SteinD. J.MorganB. (in press). Consequences of selective bilateral lesions to the basolateral amygdala in humans. In AmaralD. G.AdolphsR. (Eds.), Living without an amygdala. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
WhalenP. J. (2007). The uncertainty of it all. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 499–500.
50.
WillenbockelV.SadrJ.FisetD.HorneG.GosselinF.TanakaJ. W. (2012). Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 671–684.
51.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
