To some extent, unethical behavior results from people’s limited attention to ethical considerations, which results in an ethical blind spot. Here, we focus on the role of ambiguity in shaping people’s ethical blind spots, which in turn lead to their ethical failures. We suggest that in ambiguous settings, individuals’ attention shifts toward tempting information, which determines the magnitude of their lies. Employing a novel ambiguous-dice paradigm, we asked participants to report the outcome of the die roll appearing closest to the location of a previously presented fixation cross on a computer screen; this outcome would determine their pay. We varied the value of the die second closest to the fixation cross to be either higher (i.e., tempting) or lower (i.e., not tempting) than the die closest to the fixation cross. Results of two experiments revealed that in ambiguous settings, people’s incorrect responses were self-serving. Tracking participants’ eye movements demonstrated that people’s ethical blind spots are shaped by increased attention toward tempting information.
BalcetisE.DunningD. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612–625.
2.
BazermanM. H. (2014). The power of noticing: What the best leaders see. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
3.
BazermanM. H.TenbrunselA. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.
5.
BeeN.PrendingerH.NakasoneA.AndréE.IshizukaM. (2006). Autoselect: What you want is what you get: Real-time processing of visual attention and affect. In AndréE.DybkjaerL.MinkerW.NeumannH.WeberM. (Eds.), Perception and interactive technologies (pp. 40–52). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
6.
ChughD.BazermanM. H.BanajiM. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In MooreD. A.CainD. M.LoewensteinG.BazermanM. H. (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CohenT. R.GuniaB.Kim-JunS. Y.MurnighanJ. K. (2009). Do groups lie more than individuals? Honesty and deception as a function of strategic self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1321–1324.
8.
ConradsJ.IrlenbuschB.RilkeR. M.WalkowitzG. (2013). Lying and team incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 1–7.
9.
EratS.GneezyU. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58, 723–733.
10.
FiedlerS.GlöcknerA.NicklishA.DickhertS. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272–284.
11.
FischbacherU.Föllmi-HeusiF. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 525–547.
12.
GableP.Harmon-JonesE. (2010). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21, 211–215.
13.
GinoF.ArielyD. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445–459.
14.
GinoF.AyalS.ArielyD. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285–292.
15.
GioiaD. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–389.
16.
GlöcknerA.FiedlerS.HochmanG.AyalS.HilbigB. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 173. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173/full
17.
HalevyN.ChouE. Y. (2014). How decisions happen: Focal points and blind spots in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 398–417.
18.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
HochmanG.GlöcknerA.FiedlerS.AyalS. (2015). “I can see it in your eyes”: Biased processing and increased arousal in dishonest responses. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
20.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
21.
LundquistT.EllingsonT.GribbeE.JohannessonM. (2009). The aversion to lying. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 81–92.
22.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644.
23.
MoggK.BradleyB. P.FieldM.De HouwerJ. (2003). Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: Relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction, 98, 825–836.
24.
OrquinJ. L.Mueller-LooseS. M. (2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144, 190–206.
25.
PapiesE. K.StroebeW.AartsH. (2008). Healthy cognition: Processes of self-regulatory success in restrained eating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1290–1300.
26.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
27.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
28.
RaynerK. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.
29.
ReisenN.HoffrageU.MastF. W. (2008). Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 641–658.
30.
SchweitzerM. E.HseeC. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 185–201.
ShalviS.DanaJ.HandgraafM. J. J.De DreuC. K. W. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 181–190.
33.
ShalviS.De DreuC. K. W. (2014). Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 5503–5507.
34.
ShalviS.EldarO.Bereby-MeyerY. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23, 1264–1270.
35.
ShalviS.GinoF.BarkanR.AyalS. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 125–130.
36.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
37.
SteinelW.De DreuC. K. W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419–434.
38.
TownshendJ.DukaT. (2001). Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: Differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 157, 67–74.
39.
Van LangeP. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.
40.
von HippelW.LakinJ. L.ShakarchiR. J. (2005). Individual differences in motivated social cognition: The case of self-serving information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1347–1357.
41.
von HippelWTriversR. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 34, 1–16.
42.
WagenmakersE.-J.WetzelsR.BorsboomD.van der MaasH. L. J.KievitR. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 632–638.
43.
WeberE. U.JohnsonE. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53–85.
44.
WelshD.OrdóñezL. D. (2014). Conscience without cognition: The effects of subconscious priming on automatic ethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 723–742.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
