The ability to move upward in social class or economic position (i.e., social mobility) is a defining feature of the American Dream, yet recent public-opinion polls indicate that many Americans are losing confidence in the essential fairness of the system and their opportunities for financial advancement. In two studies, we examined Americans’ perceptions of both current levels of mobility in the United States and temporal trends in mobility, and we compared these perceptions with objective indicators to determine perceptual accuracy. Overall, participants underestimated current mobility and erroneously concluded that mobility has declined over the past four decades. These misperceptions were more pronounced among politically liberal participants than among politically moderate or conservative ones. These perception differences were accounted for by liberals’ relative dissatisfaction with the current social system, social hierarchies, and economic inequality. These findings have important implications for theories of political ideology.
BartelsL. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24, 117–150. doi:10.1023/A:1021226224601
2.
BuhrmeisterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
3.
ChambersJ. R.SchlenkerB. R.CollissonB. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24, 140–149. doi:10.1177/0956797612447820
4.
ChambersJ. R.SwanL. K.HeesackerM. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of income and income inequality in America. Psychological Science, 25, 613–618. doi:10.1177/0956797613504965
5.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KlineP.SaezE.TurnerN. (2014a). The Equality of Opportunity Project—Online Data Table 1: National 100 by 100 transition matrix. Retrieved from http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/index.php/data
6.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KlineP.SaezE.TurnerN. (2014b). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility (NBER Working Paper No. 19844). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19844
7.
CorakM. (2006). Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons from a cross country comparison of generational earnings mobility. Research on Economic Inequality, 13, 143–188. doi:10.1016/S1049-2585(06)14006-9
8.
DuchR. M.PalmerH. D.AndersonC. J. (2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 635–652. doi:10.2307/2669272
ErikssonK.SimpsonB. (2012). What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 741–745.
11.
FeatherN. T. (1984). Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1132–1141. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.1132
12.
FeyginaI.GoldsmithR. E.JostJ. T. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338. doi:10.1177/0146167209351435
13.
FrendaS. J.KnowlesE. D.SaletanW.LoftusE. F. (2013). False memories of fabricated political events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 280–286. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.013
14.
FrimerJ. A.GaucherD.SchaeferN. K. (2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1205–1214.
15.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
GranbergD.BrentE. (1983). When prophecy bends: The preference-expectation link in presidential elections, 1952–1980. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 477–491. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.477
18.
GreerT.DunlapW. P. (1997). Analysis of variance with ipsative measures. Psychological Methods, 2, 200–207. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.200
19.
HartW.AbarracinD.EaglyA. H.BrechanI.LindbergM. J.MerrillL. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588. doi:10.1037/a0015701
20.
HertzT. (2007). Trends in the intergenerational elasticity of family income in the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 46, 22–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2007.00456.x
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
23.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.SullowayF.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
24.
JussimL.CainT. R.CrawfordJ. T.HarberK.CohenF. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 199–227). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
25.
KahanD. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.
26.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
27.
LeeC.SolonG. (2009). Trends in intergenerational income mobility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 766–772. doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.766
28.
LordC.RossL.LepperM. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
29.
MorganG. S.MullenE.SkitkaL. J. (2010). When values and attributions collide: Liberals’ and conservatives’ values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1241–1254. doi:10.1177/0146167210380605
30.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?Psychological Science, 19, 565–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x
31.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12. doi:10.1177/1745691610393524
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
SchlenkerB. R.ChambersJ. R.LeB. M. (2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009
39.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
41.
TetlockP. E.MitchellG. (1993). Liberal and conservative approaches to justice: Conflicting psychological portraits. In MellersB.BaronJ. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 234–258). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
TonerK.LearyM. R.AsherM. W.Jongman-SerenoK. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science, 24, 2454–2462. doi:10.1177/0956797613494848
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
