Do We Know What We’re Saying? The Roles of Attention and Sensory Information During Speech Production

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

Z. K.

McGettigan

Banks

Scott

S. K.

(2012). Articulatory movements modulate auditory responses to speech. NeuroImage, 73, 191–199.

Brungart

D. S.

(2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101–1109.

Delvaux

Soquet

(2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64, 145–173.

Dhooge

Hartsuiker

R. J.

(2012). Lexical selection and verbal self-monitoring: Effects of lexicality, context, and time pressure in picture-word interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.004

Egner

(2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioural Neuroscience, 7, 380–390.

Gray

J. A.

Wedderburn

A. A. I.

(1960). Grouping strategies with simultaneous stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 180–184.

Kerns

J. G.

Cohen

J. D.

MacDonald

A. W.

Cho

R. Y.

Stenger

V. A.

Carter

C. S.

(2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026. doi:10.1126/science.1089910

Levelt

W. J.

(1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.

Levelt

W. J.

(2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 13464–13471.

10.

Lind

Hall

Breidegard

Balkenius

Johansson

(2014a). Auditory feedback of one’s own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: The “self-comprehension” hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 166. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00166/full

11.

Lind

Hall

Breidegard

Balkenius

Johansson

(2014b). Speakers’ acceptance of real-time speech exchange indicates that we use auditory feedback to specify the meaning of what we say. Psychological Science, 25, 1198–1205.

12.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

13.

Oomen

C. C. E.

Postma

(2002). Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 163–184. doi:10.1080/01690960143000010

14.

Pickering

M. J.

Garrod

(2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226.

15.

Roelofs

(2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125.

16.

van Veen

Carter

C. S.

(2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27, 497–504.

17.

Wise

R. J. S.

Greene

Buchel

Scott

S. K.

(1999). Brain regions involved in articulation. The Lancet, 353, 1057–1061.