Your Friends Know How Long You Will Live: A 75-Year Study of Peer-Rated Personality Traits

Abstract

Although self-rated personality traits predict mortality risk, no study has examined whether one’s friends can perceive personality characteristics that predict one’s mortality risk. Moreover, it is unclear whether observers’ reports (compared with self-reports) provide better or unique information concerning the personal characteristics that result in longer and healthier lives. To test whether friends’ reports of personality predict mortality risk, we used data from a 75-year longitudinal study (the Kelly/Connolly Longitudinal Study on Personality and Aging). In that study, 600 participants were observed beginning in 1935 through 1938, when they were in their mid-20s, and continuing through 2013. Male participants seen by their friends as more conscientious and open lived longer, whereas friend-rated emotional stability and agreeableness were protective for women. Friends’ ratings were better predictors of longevity than were self-reports of personality, in part because friends’ ratings could be aggregated to provide a more reliable assessment. Our findings demonstrate the utility of observers’ reports in the study of health and provide insights concerning the pathways by which personality traits influence health.

Keywords

personality longevity mortality informant reports survival analysis conscientiousness peers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bales

R. F.

(1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Chapman

B. P.

Roberts

Duberstein

(2011). Personality and longevity: Knowns, unknowns, and implications for public health and personalized medicine. Journal of Aging Research, 2011, Article 759170. doi:10.4061/2011/759170

Conley

J. J.

(1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait–multimethod–multioccasion analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1266–1282.

Connelly

B. S.

Ones

D. S.

(2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.

Cuijpers

Smit

Penninx

B. W.

de Graaf

ten Have

Beekman

A. T.

(2010). Economic costs of neuroticism: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1086–1093.

Deary

I. J.

Batty

G. D.

Pattie

Gale

C. R.

(2008). More intelligent, more dependable children live longer: A 55-year longitudinal study of a representative sample of the Scottish nation. Psychological Science, 19, 874–880.

Donnellan

M. B.

Conger

R. D.

Burzette

B. G.

(2005). Criterion-related validity, self-other agreement, and longitudinal analyses for the Iowa Personality Questionnaire: A short alternative to the MPQ. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 458–485.

Donnellan

M. B.

Oswald

F. L.

Baird

B. M.

Lucas

R. E.

(2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203.

Friedman

H. S.

Kern

M. L.

Hampson

S. E.

Duckworth

A. L.

(2014). A new lifespan approach to conscientiousness and health: Combining the pieces of the causal puzzle. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1377–1389. doi:10.1037/a0030373

10.

Hampson

S. E.

Friedman

H. S.

(2008). Personality and health: A lifespan perspective. In John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 770–794). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

11.

Hofstee

W. K. B.

(1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8, 149–162.

12.

Jackson

J. J.

Garrison

Levine

Connolly

J. J.

(2014). Validation of self, peer and spouse ratings of personality in the Kelly/Connolly Longitudinal Study on Personality and Aging. Unpublished manuscript, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

13.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

14.

Jokela

Batty

G. D.

Nyberg

S. T.

Virtanen

Nabi

Singh-Manoux

Kivimäki

(2013). Personality and all-cause mortality: Individual-participant meta-analysis of 3,947 deaths in 76,150 adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178, 667–675.

15.

Kelly

E. L.

(1940). A 36 trait personality rating scale. The Journal of Psychology, 9, 97–102.

16.

Kelly

E. L.

(1955). Consistency of the adult personality. American Psychologist, 10, 659–681.

17.

Kelly

E. L.

(1977). The marriage study. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

18.

Kelly

E. L.

Conley

J. J.

(1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27–40.

19.

Lodi-Smith

J. L.

Jackson

J. J.

Bogg

Walton

Wood

Harms

P. D.

Roberts

B. W.

(2010). Mechanisms of health: Education and health-related behaviors partially mediate the relationship between conscientiousness and self-reported physical health. Psychology and Health, 25, 305–319.

20.

Martin

L. R.

Friedman

H. S.

Schwartz

J. E.

(2007). Personality and mortality risk across the life span: The importance of conscientiousness as a biopsychosocial attribute. Health Psychology, 26, 428–436.

21.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

22.

R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

23.

Roberts

B. W.

Kuncel

N. R.

Shiner

Caspi

Goldberg

L. R.

(2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

24.

Singer

J. D.

Willett

J. B.

(2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Therneau

T. M.

(1999). A package for survival analysis in S (Technical Report No. 53). Retrieved from Mayo Foundation Web site: http://www.mayo.edu/research/documents/tr53pdf/doc-10027379

26.

Turiano

N. A.

Chapman

B. P.

Gruenewald

T. L.

Mroczek

D. K.

(2013). Personality and the leading behavioral contributors of mortality. Health Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/hea0000038

27.

Turiano

N. A.

Spiro

Mroczek

D. K.

(2012). Openness to experience and mortality in men: Analysis of trait and facets. Journal of Aging and Health, 24, 654–672.

28.

Vazire

(2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.

29.

Vazire

Mehl

M. R.

(2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202–1216.

30.

Weston

Hill

P. L.

Jackson

J. J.

(2014). Personality traits predict the onset of disease. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550614553248

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.75 MB