Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Substantial evidence comparing men’s perceptions of women’s sexual intentions with women’s own reports of their sexual intentions has shown a systematic pattern of results that has been interpreted as support for the idea that men overestimate women’s true sexual intentions. However, because women’s true sexual intentions cannot be directly measured, an alternative interpretation of the existing data is that women understate their sexual intentions and that men’s assessments of women’s intentions are generally accurate. In three studies, we (a) replicated the typical sex difference in sexual-intent ratings, (b) showed that men maintain their ratings of women’s sexual intentions even when incentivized to tell the truth, and (c) showed that women believe that other women are understating their sexual intentions in self-report measures. Taken together, these results imply that men might be accurate in perceiving and reporting women’s sexual intentions and that men might be managing errors through biased behavior rather than biased beliefs.

Keywords

mating sex differences decision making sexual misperception evolution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

(1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.

Alicke

M. D.

Govorun

(2005). The better-than-average effect. In Alicke

M. D.

Dunning

D. A.

Krueger

J. I.

(Eds.), Studies in self and identity (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

DeScioli

Christner

Kurzban

(2011). The omission strategy. Psychological Science, 22, 442–446.

Farris

Treat

T. A.

Viken

R. J.

McFall

R. M.

(2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66.

Gigerenzer

Hoffrage

(1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.

Haselton

M. G.

Buss

D. M.

(2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

Haselton

M. G.

Buss

D. M.

(2009). Error management theory and the evolution of misbeliefs. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 522–523.

Haselton

M. G.

Buss

D. M.

DeKay

W. T.

(1998, July). A theory of errors in cross-sex mindreading. Paper presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting, Davis, CA.

10.

Hertwig

Ortmann

(2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 383–403.

11.

Kurzban

(2010). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: Evolution and the modular mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

McKay

R. T.

Dennett

D. C.

(2009). The evolution of misbelief [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 493–561.

13.

McKay

Efferson

(2010). The subtleties of error management. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 309–319.

14.

Perilloux

(2014). (Mis)reading the signs: Men’s perception of women’s sexual interest. In Weekes-Shackelford

V. A.

Shackelford

T. K.

(Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 119–134). New York, NY: Springer.

15.

Perilloux

Easton

J. A.

Buss

D. M.

(2012). The misperception of sexual interest. Psychological Science, 23, 146–151.

16.

Taylor

S. E.

(1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.

17.

Tooby

Cosmides

(1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.

18.

Tooby

Cosmides

(1995). Mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In Gazzaniga

(Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1185–1197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Trivers

(2010). Deceit and self-deception. In Kappeler

P. M.

Silk

J. B.

(Eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 373–394). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Trivers

(2011). The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

21.

von Neumann

Morgenstern

(1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

Wiley

R. H.

(1994). Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication. In Real

(Ed.), Behavioral mechanisms in ecology (pp. 157–189). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Wilson

T. D.

(2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Do Men Overperceive Women’s Sexual Interest?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material