The ability to inhibit prepotent responses is a core executive function, but the relation of response inhibition to other cognitive operations is poorly understood. In the study reported here, we examined inhibitory control through the lens of incidental memory. Participants categorized face stimuli by gender in a go/no-go task (Experiments 1 and 2) or a stop-signal task (Experiment 3) and, after a short delay, performed a surprise recognition memory task for those faces. Memory was impaired for stimuli presented during no-go and stop trials compared with those presented during go trials. Experiment 4 showed that this inhibition-induced forgetting was not attributable to event congruency. In Experiment 5, we combined a go/no-go task with a dot-probe test and found that probe detection during no-go trials was inferior to that on go trials. This result supports the hypothesis that inhibition-induced forgetting occurs when response inhibition shunts attentional resources from perceptual stimulus encoding to action control.
AndersonM. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006
2.
AndersonM. C.BjorkR. A.BjorkE. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
AronA. R.BehrensT. E.SmithS.FrankM. J.PoldrackR. A. (2007). Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3743–3752. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-07.2007
5.
BotvinickM. M.BraverT. S.BarchD. M.CarterC. S.CohenJ. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
6.
BrewerJ. B.ZhaoZ.DesmondJ. E.GloverG. H.GabrieliJ. D. (1998). Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science, 281, 1185–1187. doi:10.1126/science.281.5380.1185
7.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
8.
BungeS. A.BurrowsB.WagnerA. D. (2004). Prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to visual associative recognition: Interactions between cognitive control and episodic retrieval. Brain and Cognition, 56, 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.08.001
9.
ChathamC. H.ClausE. D.KimA.CurranT.BanichM. T.MunakataY. (2012). Cognitive control reflects context monitoring, not motoric stopping, in response inhibition. PLoS ONE, 7(2), Article e31546. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031546
10.
ChikazoeJ. (2010). Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23, 267–272. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283387a9f
11.
ChiuY.-C.AronA. R.VerbruggenF. (2012). Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1908–1918. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00247
12.
CraikF. I.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
13.
DesimoneR.DuncanJ. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
14.
De WitH. (2009). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: A review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology, 14, 22–31. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x
15.
DoddsC. M.Morein-ZamirS.RobbinsT. W. (2011). Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1155–1165. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq187
16.
DreisbachG.WenkeD. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1540–1546. doi:10.1037/a0024077
17.
EagleD. M.BaunezC. (2010). Is there an inhibitory-response-control system in the rat? Evidence from anatomical and pharmacological studies of behavioral inhibition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 50–72. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.003
18.
EgnerT.HirschJ. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594
19.
EgnerT.MontiJ. M.SummerfieldC. (2010). Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 16601–16608. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2770-10.2010
20.
FawcettJ. M.TaylorT. L. (2010). Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 38, 797–808. doi:10.3758/MC.38.6.797
21.
FranzV. H.LoftusG. R. (2012). Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 395–404. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0230-1
22.
GilliesA. J.WillshawD. J. (1998). A massively connected subthalamic nucleus leads to the generation of widespread pulses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 2101–2109. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0546
23.
HornN. R.DolanM.ElliottR.DeakinJ. F. W.WoodruffP. W. R. (2003). Response inhibition and impulsivity: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1959–1966. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00077-0
24.
JuradoM. B.RosselliM. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17, 213–233. doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z
LevyB. J.WagnerA. D. (2011). Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: Reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 40–62. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x
27.
LoganG. D. (1983). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: I. Stop-signal studies of decision and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 585–606. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.585
28.
LoganG. D.CowanW. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
29.
MillerE. K.CohenJ. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
30.
MinkJ. W. (1996). The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology, 50, 381–425. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00042-1
31.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In SolsoR. L. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
RichterF. R.YeungN. (2012). Memory and cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Science, 23, 1256–1263. doi:10.1177/0956797612444613
37.
RosnerT. M.D’AngeloM. C.MacLellanE.MillikenB. (2014). Selective attention and recognition: Effects of congruency on episodic learning. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0572-6
38.
SwallowK. M.JiangY. V. (2010). The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition, 115, 118–132. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.003
39.
VerbruggenF.LoganG. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–672. doi:10.1037/a0013170
40.
YamaguchiM.LoganG. D.BissettP. G. (2012). Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 123–134. doi:10.1037/a0023918
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
