This study examined whether variations in brain development between kindergarten and Grade 3 predicted individual differences in reading ability at Grade 3. Structural MRI measurements indicated that increases in the volume of two left temporo-parietal white matter clusters are unique predictors of reading outcomes above and beyond family history, socioeconomic status, and cognitive and preliteracy measures at baseline. Using diffusion MRI, we identified the left arcuate fasciculus and superior corona radiata as key fibers within the two clusters. Bias-free regression analyses using regions of interest from prior literature revealed that volume changes in temporo-parietal white matter, together with preliteracy measures, predicted 56% of the variance in reading outcomes. Our findings demonstrate the important contribution of developmental differences in areas of left dorsal white matter, often implicated in phonological processing, as a sensitive early biomarker for later reading abilities, and by extension, reading difficulties.
AshburnerJ. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage, 38, 95–113. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
2.
BachS.RichardsonU.BrandeisD.MartinE.BremS. (2013). Print-specific multimodal brain activation in kindergarten improves prediction of reading skills in second grade. NeuroImage, 82, 605–615. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.062
3.
BeaulieuC.PlewesC.PaulsonL. A.RoyD.SnookL.ConchaL.PhillipsL. (2005). Imaging brain connectivity in children with diverse reading ability. NeuroImage, 25, 1266–1271. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.053
4.
Ben-ShacharM.DoughertyR. F.WandellB. A. (2007). White matter pathways in reading. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 258–270.
5.
BlackJ. M.TanakaH.StanleyL.NagamineM.ZakeraniN.ThurstonA. . . . HoeftF. (2012). Maternal history of reading difficulty is associated with reduced language-related gray matter in beginning readers. NeuroImage, 59, 3021–3032. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.024
6.
BoweyJ. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476–487. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.476
7.
CaravolasM.LervågA.MousikouP.EfrimC.LitavskýM.Onochie-QuintanillaE. . . . HulmeC. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. doi:10.1177/0956797611434536
8.
CataniM.JonesD. K.ffytcheD. H. (2005). Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Annals of Neurology, 57, 8–16. doi:10.1002/ana.20319
9.
CoxR. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.
10.
DeutschG. K.DoughertyR. F.BammerR.SiokW. T.GabrieliJ. D. E.WandellB. (2005). Children’s reading performance is correlated with white matter structure measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex, 41, 354–363.
11.
DickA. S.TremblayP. (2012). Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: Consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. Brain, 135, 3529–3550. doi:10.1093/brain/aws222
12.
DunnL. M.DunnD. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4) manual (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
13.
FjellA. M.WestlyeL. T.GreveD. N.FischlB.BennerT.van der KouweA. J. W. . . . WalhovdK. B. (2008). The relationship between diffusion tensor imaging and volumetry as measures of white matter properties. NeuroImage, 42, 1654–1668. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.005
14.
GieddJ. N.RapoportJ. L. (2010). Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: What have we learned and where are we going?Neuron, 67, 728–734. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.040
15.
HoeftF.HernandezA.McMillonG.Taylor-HillH.MartindaleJ. L.MeylerA. . . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2006). Neural basis of dyslexia: A comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading ability. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 10700–10708. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4931-05.2006
16.
HoeftF.McCandlissB. D.BlackJ. M.GantmanA.ZakeraniN.HulmeC. . . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2011). Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 361–366. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008950108
17.
HoeftF.MeylerA.HernandezA.JuelC.Taylor-HillH.MartindaleJ. L. . . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2007). Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 4234–4239. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609399104
18.
HoeftF.UenoT.ReissA. L.MeylerA.Whitfield-GabrieliS.GloverG. H. . . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2007). Prediction of children’s reading skills using behavioral, functional, and structural neuroimaging measures. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 602–613. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.602
19.
IshibashiT.DakinK. A.StevensB.LeeP. R.KozlovS. V.StewartC. L.FieldsR. D. (2006). Astrocytes promote myelination in response to electrical impulses. Neuron, 49, 823–832. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.006
20.
KellerT. A.JustM. A. (2009). Altering cortical connectivity: Remediation-induced changes in the white matter of poor readers. Neuron, 64, 624–631. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.018
21.
KlingbergT.HedehusM.TempleE.SalzT.GabrieliJ. D.MoseleyM. E.PoldrackR. A. (2000). Microstructure of temporo-parietal white matter as a basis for reading ability: Evidence from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuron, 25, 493–500.
22.
LeemansA.JonesD. K. (2009). The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 61, 1336–1349. doi:10.1002/mrm.21890
23.
LeflyD. L.PenningtonB. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 286–296.
24.
LervågA.BråtenI.HulmeC. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45, 764–781. doi:10.1037/a0014132
25.
LibermanI. Y.ShankweilerD.FischerF. W.CarterB. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5
26.
López-BarrosoD.CataniM.RipollésP.Dell’AcquaF.Rodríguez-FornellsA.de Diego-BalaguerR. (2013). Word learning is mediated by the left arcuate fasciculus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 13168–13173. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301696110
27.
MarvinC. A.OgdenN. J. (2002). A Home Literacy Inventory: Assessing young children’s contexts for emergent literacy. Young Exceptional Children, 5, 2–10.
28.
MatherM.WoodcockR. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
29.
McGrewK. S.SchrankF. A. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update technical manual. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
30.
McNorganC.AlvarezA.BhullarA.GaydaJ.BoothJ. R. (2011). Prediction of reading skill several years later depends on age and brain region: Implications for developmental models of reading. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9641–9648. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0334-11.2011
31.
NagyZ.WesterbergH.KlingbergT. (2004). Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1227–1233. doi:10.1162/0898929041920441
32.
NiogiS. N.McCandlissB. D. (2006). Left lateralized white matter microstructure accounts for individual differences in reading ability and disability. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2178–2188. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.011
33.
OdegardT. N.FarrisE. A.RingJ.McCollR.BlackJ. (2009). Brain connectivity in non-reading impaired children and children diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1972–1977. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.009
34.
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
35.
PetersonR. L.PenningtonB. F. (2012). Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet, 379, 1997–2007. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60198-6
36.
PierpaoliC.BasserP. J. (1996). Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 36, 893–906. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360612
37.
SayginZ. M.NortonE. S.OsherD. E.BeachS. D.CyrA. B.Ozernov-PalchikO. . . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2013). Tracking the roots of reading ability: White matter volume and integrity correlate with phonological awareness in prereading and early-reading kindergarten children. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 13251–13258. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4383-12.2013
38.
SemelE.WiigE. H.SecordW. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
39.
ShawP.EckstrandK.SharpW.BlumenthalJ.LerchJ. P.GreensteinD. . . . RapoportJ. L. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 19649–19654. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707741104
40.
SmithT. E.GrahamP. B. (1995). Socioeconomic stratification in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 930–940. doi:10.2307/353413
41.
Thiebaut de SchottenM.CohenL.AmemiyaE.BragaL. W.DehaeneS. (2012). Learning to read improves the structure of the arcuate fasciculus. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 989–995. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs383
42.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
43.
VandermostenM.BoetsB.PoelmansH.SunaertS.WoutersJ.GhesquièreP. (2012). A tractography study in dyslexia: Neuroanatomic correlates of orthographic, phonological and speech processing. Brain, 135, 935–948. doi:10.1093/brain/awr363
44.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
45.
WakanaS.CaprihanA.PanzenboeckM. M.FallonJ. H.PerryM.GollubR. L. . . . MoriS. (2007). Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. NeuroImage, 36, 630–644. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.049
46.
WolfM.DencklaM. B. (2005). Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus Tests. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
47.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ-III). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
48.
YamadaY.StevensC.DowM.HarnB. A.ChardD. J.NevilleH. J. (2011). Emergence of the neural network for reading in five-year-old beginning readers of different levels of pre-literacy abilities: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 57, 704–713. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.057
49.
YeatmanJ. D.DoughertyR. F.Ben-ShacharM.WandellB. A. (2012). Development of white matter and reading skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, E3045–E3053. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206792109
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
