Previous work has identified a distributed network of neural systems involved in appraising the value of rewards, such as when winning $100 versus $1. These studies, however, confounded monetary value and the number used to represent it, which leads to the possibility that some elements in the network may be specialized for processing numeric rather than monetary value. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated numeric magnitude and units to construct a range of economic rewards for simple decisions (e.g., 1¢, $1, 100¢, $100). Consistent with previous research in numerical cognition, results showed that blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activity in intraparietal sulcus was correlated with changes in numeric magnitude, independent of monetary value, whereas activity in orbitofrontal cortex was correlated with monetary value, independent of numeric magnitude. Finally, region-of-interest analyses revealed that the BOLD response to numeric magnitude, but not monetary value, described a compressive function. Together, these findings highlight the importance of numerical cognition for understanding how the brain processes monetary rewards.
ArsalidouM.TaylorM. J. (2011). Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. NeuroImage, 54, 2382–2393. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.009
2.
BallardK.KnutsonB. (2009). Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting. NeuroImage, 45, 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.004
3.
BernsG. S.BellE. (2012). Striatal topography of probability and magnitude information for decisions under uncertainty. NeuroImage, 59, 3166–3172.
CantlonJ. F.LibertusM. E.PinelP.DehaeneS.BrannonE. M.PelphreyK. A. (2009). The neural development of an abstract concept of number. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2217–2229.
6.
ClitheroJ. A.CarterR. M.HuettelS. A. (2009). Local pattern classification differentiates processes of economic valuation. NeuroImage, 45, 1329–1338. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.074
7.
Cohen KadoshR.WalshV. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 313–328. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990938
8.
CunninghamW. A.KesekA.MowrerS. M. (2009). Distinct orbitofrontal regions encode stimulus and choice valuation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1956–1966. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21148
9.
DecoG.RollsE. (2005). Decision-making and Weber’s law: A neurophysiological model. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 901–916. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04940.x
10.
DehaeneS.PiazzaM.PinelP.CohenL. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239
11.
FurlongE. E.OpferJ. E. (2009). Cognitive constraints on how economic rewards affect cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 11–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02244.x
12.
GlimcherP. W.DorrisM. C.BayerH. M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 213–256. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.011
13.
GlimcherP. W.FehrR. A.PoldrackR. A. (2009). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
GreveD. N.FischlB. (2009). Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage, 48, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060
15.
HareT. A.O’DohertyJ.CamererC.SchultzW.RangelA. (2008). Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5623–5630. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008
16.
HareT. A.SchultzW.CamererC.O’DohertyJ.RangelA. (2011). Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 18120–18125.
17.
HollowayI. D.AnsariD. (2010). Developmental specialization in the right intraparietal sulcus for the abstract representation of numerical magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2627–2637.
18.
JenkinsonM.BannisterP.BradyM.SmithS. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17, 825–841. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132
19.
JenkinsonM.SmithS. M. (2001). A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 143–156. doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6
20.
KableJ. W.GlimcherP. W. (2009). The neurobiology of decision: Consensus and controversy. Neuron, 63, 733–745. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003
21.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
22.
LinA.AdolphsA.RangelA. (2011). Social and monetary reward learning engage overlapping neural substrates. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 274–281. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr006
23.
LiuX.HairstonJ.SchrierM.FanJ. (2011). Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1219–1236. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.012
24.
LouieK.GrattanL. E.GlimcherP. W. (2011). Reward value-based gain control: Divisive normalization in parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10627–10639. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-11.2011
25.
MertenK.NiederA. (2009). Compressed scaling of abstract numerosity representations in adult humans and monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 333–346. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21032
26.
NiederA.MillerE. K. (2004). Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: Evidence for parallel processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 889–901.
27.
NieuwenhuisS.HeslenfeldD. J.Alting von GeusauN. J.MarsR. B.HolroydC. B.YeungN. (2005). Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent. NeuroImage, 25, 1302–1309. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.043
28.
O’DohertyJ.CritchleyH.DeichmannR.DolanR. J. (2003). Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 7931–7939.
29.
Padoa-SchioppaC.AssadJ. A. (2006). Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature, 441, 223–226. doi:10.1038/nature04676
30.
Padoa-SchioppaC.AssadJ. A. (2008). The representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex is invariant for changes of menu. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 95–102. doi:10.1038/nn2020
31.
PetersE.SlovicP.VästfjällD.MertzC. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 619–635.
32.
PetersJ.BucherC. (2009). Overlapping and distinct neural systems code for subjective value during intertemporal and risky decision making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 15727–15734. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3489-09.2009
33.
PiazzaM.IzardV.PinelP.Le BihanD.DehaeneS. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547–555. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014
34.
PiazzaM.PinelP.Le BihanD.DehaeneS. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293–305.
35.
PlassmannH.O’DohertyJ.RangelA. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9984–9988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007
36.
PlattM. L.GlimcherP. W. (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, 400, 233–238. doi:10.1038/22268
37.
PoldrackR. A. (2007). Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 2, 67–70. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm006
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
40.
SmithS. M. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 143–155. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062
41.
TomS. M.FoxC. R.TrepelC.PoldrackR. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision making under risk. Science, 315, 515–518. doi:10.1126/science.1134239
42.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
