BergerJ. O.BerryD. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76, 159–165.
2.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
3.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
5.
JeffreysH. (1961). The theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N.VerhagenJ.WagenmakersE.-J. (2014). Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming (2014). Psychological Science, 25, 1289–1290.
7.
VelicerW. F.CummingG.FavaJ. L.RossiJ. S.ProchaskaJ. O.JohnsonJ. (2008). Theory testing using quantitative predictions of effect size. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 589–608. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00348.x
8.
WagenmakersE.-J.LeeM. D.LodewyckxT.IversonG. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In HoijtinkH.KlugkistI.BoelenP. A. (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in psychology (pp. 181–207). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
WilsonP. H.McKenzieB. E. (1998). Information processing deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder: A meta-analysis of research findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 829–840.