Studies on first impressions from facial appearance have rapidly proliferated in the past decade. Almost all of these studies have relied on a single face image per target individual, and differences in impressions have been interpreted as originating in stable physiognomic differences between individuals. Here we show that images of the same individual can lead to different impressions, with within-individual image variance comparable to or exceeding between-individuals variance for a variety of social judgments (Experiment 1). We further show that preferences for images shift as a function of the context (e.g., selecting an image for online dating vs. a political campaign; Experiment 2), that preferences are predictably biased by the selection of the images (e.g., an image fitting a political campaign vs. a randomly selected image; Experiment 3), and that these biases are evident after extremely brief (40-ms) presentation of the images (Experiment 4). We discuss the implications of these findings for studies on the accuracy of first impressions.
BarM.NetaM.LinzH. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269–278.
2.
BorkenauP.LieblerA. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657.
3.
BurtonA. M.JenkinsR. (2011). Unfamiliar face perception. In CalderA.HaxbyJ. V.JohnsonM.RhodesG. (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 287–306). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651–2656.
5.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198.
6.
CollinsA. F. (1999). The enduring appeal of physiognomy: Physical appearance as a sign of temperament, character, and intelligence. History of Psychology, 2, 251–276.
7.
DeanerR. O.GoetzS. M. M.ShattuckK.SchnotalaT. (2012). Body weight, not facial width-to-height ratio, predicts aggression in pro hockey players. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 235–238.
8.
FloweH. D.HumphriesJ. E. (2011). An examination of criminal face bias in a random sample of police lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 265–273.
9.
GoetzS. M. M.ShattuckK. S.MillerR. M.CampbellJ. A.LozoyaE.WeisfeldG. E.CarréJ. M. (2013). Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression. Psychological Science, 24, 2329–2334.
10.
Gómez-ValdésJ.HünemeierT.Quinto-SánchezM.PaschettaC.AzevedoS.GonzálezM. F.. . . González-JoséR. (2012). Lack of support for the association between facial shape and aggression: A reappraisal based on a worldwide population genetics perspective. PLoS ONE, 8(1), Article e52317. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0052317
HassinR.TropeY. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–852.
13.
JenkinsR.WhiteD.Van MontfortX.BurtonA. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323.
14.
McArthurL. A.BaronR. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238.
15.
MontepareJ. M.DobishH. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 237–254.
16.
NethD.MartinezA. M. (2009). Emotion perception in emotionless face images suggests a norm-based representation. Journal of Vision, 9(1), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/1/5.full
17.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010a). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110.
18.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010b). Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 315–324.
19.
Penton-VoakI. S.PoundN.LittleA. C.PerrettD. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607–640.
PhillipsP. J.RaussP. J.DerS. Z. (1996). FERET (Face Recognition Technology): Recognition algorithm development and test results (ARL-TR-995). Adelphi, MD: Army Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/humanid/feret/doc/army_feret3.pdf
22.
PorterS.EnglandL.JuodisM.ten BrinkeL.WilsonK. (2008). Is the face the window to the soul?: Investigation of the accuracy of intuitive judgments of the trustworthiness of human faces. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40, 171–177.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008a). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.
25.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008b). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109–111.
SaidC.SebeN.TodorovA. (2009). Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion, 9, 260–264.
28.
SamochowiecJ.WänkeM.FiedlerK. (2010). Political ideology at face value. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 206–213.
29.
SecordP. F. (1958). Facial features and inference processes in interpersonal perception. In TagiuriR.PetrulloL. (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 301–315). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
TodorovA.DotschR.PorterJ. M.OosterhofN. N.FalvelloV. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13, 724–738.
31.
TodorovA.PakrashiM.OosterhofN. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813–833.
32.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.VeroskyS. C. (2011). Personality impressions from facial appearance. In CalderA.HaxbyJ. V.JohnsonM.RhodesG. (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 631–652). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
VallaJ. M.CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M. (2011). The accuracy of inferences about criminality based on facial appearance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 66–91.
34.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
35.
ZebrowitzL. A. (2011). Ecological and social approaches to face perception. In CalderA.HaxbyJ. V.JohnsonM.RhodesG. (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 31–50). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
ZebrowitzL. A.KikuchiM.FellousJ. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 175–189.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
