BarthelméS.MamassianP. (2010). Flexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 20834–20839.
4.
FlemingS. M.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2012). Metacognition: Computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 1280–1286.
5.
GreenD. M.SwetsJ. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
HillisJ. M.ErnstM. O.BanksM. S.LandyM. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627–1630.
7.
MassonM. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690.
8.
PeirceC. S.JastrowJ. (1884). On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 73–83.
9.
PleskacT. J.BusemeyerJ. (2010). Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of confidence, choice, and response time. Psychological Review, 117, 864–901.
10.
YeungN.SummerfieldC. (2012). Metacognition in human decision making: Confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 1310–1321.
11.
ZhangH.MaloneyL. T. (2012). Ubiquitous log odds: A common representation for probability and frequency distortion in perception, action, and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, Article 1. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00001/full
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.