DuranteK. M.RaeA.GriskeviciusV. (2013). The fluctuating female vote: Politics, religion, and the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 24, 1007–1016. doi:10.1177/0956797612466416
2.
HarrisC. R. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64, 669–681. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9772-8
3.
HarrisC. R.ChabotA.MickesL. (2013). Shifts in methodology and theory in menstrual cycle research on attraction. Sex Roles, 69, 525–535.
4.
PashlerH.WagenmakersE.-J. (Eds.). (2012). Special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–654.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
7.
WoodW.KresselL.JoshiP.LouieB. (in press). Women’s mate preferences: A meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects. Emotion Review.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
