Positive and Negative Correlations Between Confidence and Accuracy for the Same Events in Recognition of Categorized Lists

Abstract

Different researchers have reported positive, null, and negative relationships between confidence and accuracy in reports from memory. One possible reason for this paradox is the variety of materials used across experiments, but the two experiments reported in this article show that positive and negative confidence-accuracy correlations can be observed using a single procedure and the same materials. Subjects studied words from semantic categories and then took a recognition test while making confidence ratings. For previously studied items, positive correlations between confidence and accuracy were obtained using three different measures. Yet when confidence-accuracy correlations were assessed for unstudied items from studied categories, the correlations were zero or negative. The critical factors in determining when negative correlations will be found are the similarity of lures to presented items and the type of analysis used. These results indicate that one should be cautious about relying on confidence of recognition when rememberers must decide among highly similar events.

Keywords

accuracy confidence episodic memory metamemory recognition memory eyewitness memory false memory long-term memory judgment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battig

W. F.

Montague

W. E.

(1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1–46.

Brewer

Wells

G. L.

(2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11–30.

Buckhout

(1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American, 231, 21–31.

Dallenbach

K. M.

(1913). The relation of memory error to time interval. Psychological Review, 20, 323–337.

DeSoto

K. A.

(in press). Collecting confidence ratings in cognitive psychology experiments: Investigating the relationship between confidence and accuracy in memory. In Brindle

(Ed.), SAGE cases in methodology. New York, NY: Sage.

Dewhurst

S. A.

(2001). Category repetition and false recognition: Effects of instance frequency and category size. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 153–167.

Dewhurst

S. A.

Anderson

S. J.

(1999). Effects of exact and category repetition in true and false recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 665–673.

Dunlosky

Metcalfe

(2009). Metacognition. New York, NY: Sage.

Koriat

(2008). Subjective confidence in one’s answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 945–959.

10.

Koriat

(2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80–113.

11.

Maxwell

S. E.

Delaney

H. D.

(2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison approach (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972).

13.

Nelson

T. O.

(1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133.

14.

Odinot

Wolters

van Koppen

P. J.

(2008). Eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: A case study of accuracy and confidence after three months. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 506–514.

15.

Olejnik

Algina

(2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241–286.

16.

Roediger

H. L.

DeSoto

K. A.

(2014). Confidence and memory: Assessing positive and negative correlations. Memory, 22, 76–91.

17.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. B.

(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.

18.

Roediger

H. L.

Wixted

J. T.

DeSoto

K. A.

(2012). The curious complexity between confidence and accuracy in reports from memory. In Nadel

Sinnott-Armstrong

(Eds.), Memory and law (pp. 84–118). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

19.

Sampaio

Brewer

W. F.

(2009). The role of unconscious memory errors in judgments of confidence for sentence recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 158–163.

20.

Smith

S. M.

Ward

T. B.

Tindell

D. R.

Sifonis

C. M.

Wilkenfeld

M. J.

(2000). Category structure and created memories. Memory & Cognition, 28, 386–395.

21.

Smith

V. L.

Kassin

S. M.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Within- versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 356–359.

22.

Sommers

M. S.

Lewis

B. P.

(1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 83–108.

23.

Tulving

(1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 479–496.

24.

Tulving

Thomson

D. M.

(1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.

25.

Van Overschelde

J. P.

Rawson

K. A.

Dunlosky

(2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335.

26.

Watson

J. M.

Balota

D. A.

Roediger

H. L.

III. (2003). Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 95–118.

27.

Weinstein

(2012). Flash programming for the social and behavioral sciences: A sophisticated guide to online surveys and experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

Wells

G. L.

Murray

D. M.

(1983). What can psychology say about the Neil v. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 347–362.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.58 MB