Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The poor are universally stigmatized. The stigma of poverty includes being perceived as incompetent and feeling shunned and disrespected. It can lead to cognitive distancing, diminish cognitive performance, and cause the poor to forego beneficial programs. In the present research, we examined how self-affirmation can mitigate the stigma of poverty through randomized field experiments involving low-income individuals at an inner-city soup kitchen. Because of low literacy levels, we used an oral rather than written affirmation procedure, in which participants verbally described a personal experience that made them feel successful or proud. Compared with nonaffirmed participants, affirmed individuals exhibited better executive control, higher fluid intelligence, and a greater willingness to avail themselves of benefits programs. The effects were not driven by elevated positive mood, and the same intervention did not affect the performance of wealthy participants. The findings suggest that self-affirmation can improve the cognitive performance and decisions of the poor, and it may have important policy implications.

Keywords

self-affirmation fluid intelligence executive control behavioral intervention benefits take-up poverty intervention stereotyped attitudes policy making cognition(s)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

Cohen

G. L.

Nail

P. R.

(1999). Self-affirmation theory: An update and appraisal. In Harmon-Jones

Mills

(Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 127–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bertrand

Mullainathan

Shafir

(2006). Behavioral economics and marketing in aid of decision making among the poor. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25, 8–23.

Bissett

Coussins

(1982). Badge of poverty: A new look at the stigma attached to free school meals. London, England: Child Poverty Action Group.

Cohen

G. L.

Garcia

Apfel

Master

(2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310.

Cohen

G. L.

Garcia

Purdie-Vaughns

Apfel

Brzustoski

(2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324, 400–403.

Cohen

J. D.

Dunbar

McClelland

J. L.

(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

Croizet

Claire

(1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Fiske

S. T.

Glick

(2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.

Currie

Grogger

Burtless

Schoeni

R. F.

(2001). Explaining recent declines in food stamp program participation. In Gale

W. G.

Pack

J. R.

, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (pp. 203–244). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

10.

Davidson

M. C.

Amso

Anderson

L. C.

Diamond

(2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037–2078.

11.

Engle

R. W.

Tuholski

S. W.

Laughlin

J. E.

Conway

A. R.

(1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

12.

Fiske

(2011). Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

13.

Harris

P. R.

Epton

(2010). The impact of self-affirmation on health-related cognition and health behaviour: Issues and prospects. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 439–454.

14.

Horan

P. M.

Austin

P. L.

(1974). The social bases of welfare stigma. Social Problems, 21, 648–657.

15.

Howell

J. L.

Shepperd

J. A.

(2012). Reducing information avoidance through affirmation. Psychological Science, 23, 141–145.

16.

Kerbo

H. R.

(1976). The stigma of welfare and a passive poor. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 173–187.

17.

Kissane

R. J.

(2003). What’s need got to do with it? Barriers to use of nonprofit social services. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 30, 127–148.

18.

Legault

Al-Khindi

Inzlicht

(2012). Preserving integrity in the face of performance threat self-affirmation enhances neurophysiological responsiveness to errors. Psychological Science, 23, 1455–1460.

19.

Mani

Mullainathan

Shafir

Zhao

(2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341, 976–980.

20.

Mazerolle

Régner

Morisset

Rigalleau

Huguet

(2012). Stereotype threat strengthens automatic recall and undermines controlled processes in older adults. Psychological Science, 23, 723–727.

21.

McQueen

Klein

(2006). Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5, 289–354.

22.

Mullainathan

Shafir

(2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

23.

Norman

D. A.

Shallice

(1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In Davidson

R. I.

Schwartz

G. E.

Shapiro

(Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

24.

Pontón

M. O.

Satz

Herrea

Ortiz

Urrutia

C. P.

Young

. . . Namerow

(1996). Normative data stratified by age and education for the Neuropsychological Screening Battery for Hispanics (NeSBHIS): Initial report. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 96–104.

25.

Raven

(2000). The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48.

26.

Reutter

L. I.

Stewart

M. J.

Veenstra

Love

Raphael

Makwarimba

(2009). “Who do they think we are, anyway?” Perceptions of and responses to poverty stigma. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 297–311.

27.

Rogers-Dillon

(1995). The dynamics of welfare stigma. Qualitative Sociology, 18, 439–456.

28.

Schmader

Johns

Forbes

(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.

29.

Shafir

(Ed.). (2012). The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

30.

Sherman

D. K.

Cohen

G. L.

(2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In Zanna

M. P.

, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

31.

Sherman

D. K.

Hartson

K. A.

Binning

K. R.

Purdie-Vaughns

Garcia

Taborsky-Barba

Cohen

G. L.

(2013). Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: How self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 591–618.

32.

Spencer

S. J.

Steele

C. M.

Quinn

D. M.

(1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.

33.

Steele

C. M.

(1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In Berkowitz

, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

34.

Steele

C. M.

(1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

35.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 18, 643–662.

36.

Thaler

R. H.

Sunstein

C. R.

(2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.53 MB

Self-Affirmation Among the Poor

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material