Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Three studies examined Americans’ perceptions of incomes and income inequality using a variety of criterion measures. Contrary to recent findings indicating that Americans underestimate wealth inequality, we found that Americans not only overestimated the rise of income inequality over time, but also underestimated average incomes. Thus, economic conditions in America are more favorable than people seem to realize. Furthermore, ideological differences emerged in two of these studies, such that political liberals overestimated the rise of inequality more than political conservatives. Implications of these findings for public policy debates and ideological disagreements are discussed.

Keywords

inequality fairness justice political ideology wealth income

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980

Chapman

G. B.

Johnson

E. J.

(2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In Gilovich

Griffin

Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 120–138). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Cox

M. W.

Alm

(1999). Myths of poor and rich: Why we’re better off than we think. New York, NY: Basic Books.

DeNavas-Walt

Proctor

B. D.

Smith

J. C.

(2011). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010 (U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports P60-239). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p60-239.pdf

Duch

R. M.

Palmer

H. D.

Anderson

C. J.

(2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 635–652.

Eriksson

Simpson

(2012). What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 741–745.

Haidt

(2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Jacoby

W. G.

(2010). Policy attitudes, ideology, and voting behavior in the 2008 election. Electoral Studies, 29, 557–568. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.003

Napier

J. L.

Jost

J. T.

(2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x

10.

Norton

M. I.

Ariely

(2011). Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12. doi:10.1177/1745691610393524

11.

Paolacci

Chandler

Ipeirotis

P. G.

(2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.

12.

Ruppert

(2006). Trimming and winsorization. In Kotz

Balakrishnan

Read

Vidakovic

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (2nd ed., pp. 8765–8770). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

13.

Schlenker

B. R.

Chambers

J. R.

B. M.

(2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009

14.

Taylor

Funk

Craighill

(2006). Are we happy yet? (Pew Research Center Social Trends Report). Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/301/are-we-happy-yet

15.

Tetlock

P. E.

Mitchell

(1993). Liberal and conservative approaches to justice: Conflicting psychological portraits. In Mellers

B. A.

Baron

(Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 234–256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511552069.012

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.98 MB