Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A growing body of evidence has linked individual differences in facial structure—in particular, the facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR)—to social behaviors, including aggression, cheating, and nonreciprocation of trust. In the research reported here, we extended this work by demonstrating that the association between FWHR and aggression is moderated by subjective and objective measures of social status. In Study 1 (N = 237 college students), FWHR was positively correlated with aggressive behavior, but only among men reporting relatively low social status. In Study 2 (N = 891 professional hockey players), FWHR was positively correlated with penalty minutes, but only among players who earned relatively low salaries. Collectively, these studies provide compelling evidence for the role of social status in moderating the relationship between facial structure and aggression, indicating that FWHR is a robust predictor of aggressive behavior, but only in the context of relatively low social status.

Keywords

aggressive behavior facial features social behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

N. E.

Epel

E. S.

Castellazzo

Ickovics

J. R.

(2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.

Carré

J. M.

McCormick

C. M.

(2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behavior in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651–2656.

Carré

J. M.

McCormick

C. M.

Mondloch

C. J.

(2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198.

Caspi

Hariri

A. R.

Holmes

Uher

Moffitt

T. E.

(2010). Genetic sensitivity to the environment: The case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 509–527.

Cherek

D. R.

Tcheremissine

O. V.

Lane

S. D.

(2006). Psychopharmacology of human aggression: Laboratory and clinical studies. In Nelson

R. J.

(Ed.), Biology of aggression (pp. 424–446). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Deaner

R. O.

Goetz

S. M. M.

Shattuck

Schnotala

(2012). Body weight, not facial width-to-height ratio, predicts aggression in pro hockey players. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 235–238.

Haselhuhn

M. P.

Wong

E. M.

(2011). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1194–1198.

Hehman

Leitner

J. B.

Deegan

M. P.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2013). Facial structure is indicative of explicit support for prejudicial beliefs. Psychological Science, 24, 289–296.

Lefevre

C. E.

Lewis

G. J.

Perrett

D. I.

Penke

(2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 273–279.

10.

Ozener

(2012). Facial width-to-height ratio in a Turkish population is not sexually dimorphic and is unrelated to aggressive behavior. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 169–173.

11.

Rule

N. O.

Ambady

Adams

R. B.

Jr. Macrae

C. N.

(2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028.

12.

Sell

Cosmides

Tooby

Sznycer

von Rueden

Gurven

(2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 575–584.

13.

Stirrat

Perrett

D. I.

(2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354.

14.

Stirrat

Perrett

D. I.

(2012). Face structure predicts cooperation: Men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient. Psychological Science, 23, 718–722.

15.

Stirrat

Stulp

Pollet

T. V.

(2012). Male facial width is associated with death by contact violence: Narrow-faced males are more likely to die from contact violence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 551–556.

16.

Weston

E. M.

Friday

A. E.

Lio

(2007). Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face. PLoS ONE, 2, 1–8.

17.

Wilson

Daly

Pound

(2009). Sex differences and intrasexual variation in competitive confrontation and risk taking: An evolutionary psychological perspective. In Pfaff

D. W.

Arnold

A. P.

Etgen

A. M.

Fahrbach

S. E.

Rubin

R. T.

(Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (2nd ed., pp. 2825–2852). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

18.

Wong

E. M.

Ormiston

M. E.

Haselhuhn

M. P.

(2011). A face only an investor could love: CEOs’ facial structure predicts their firms’ financial performance. Psychological Science, 22, 1478–1483.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.47 MB

Social Status Moderates the Relationship Between Facial Structure and Aggression

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material