The significant number of financial and academic frauds hitting the headlines is paralleled by high rates of cheating in schools. Does adherence to the neoliberal values that underpin our economic and academic systems predict acceptance of cheating? Four studies revealed that adherence to neoliberal values of self-enhancement—power and achievement—predicts the motivation to gain social approval; this motivation, in turn, favors the adoption of context-specific competitive performance-approach goals, which predict the condoning of cheating. An experimental study showed that when participants were exposed to a source promoting the values of universalism and benevolence (self-transcendence values, the normative opposite of self-enhancement values), self-enhancement adherence ceased to predict the condoning of cheating. Most important, a classroom-based study addressed the core question of cheating behavior, revealing that adherence to self-enhancement values indeed predicted actual cheating behavior. These results point to the relevance of diagnosing societal values as social causes of cheating.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
AndermanE. M.DannerF. (2008). Achievement goals and academic cheating. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155–180.
3.
BooneP.JohnsonS. (2010). Will the politics of global moral hazard sink us again? In The future of finance: The LSE report (pp. 247–288). London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://harr123et.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/futureoffinance5.pdf
4.
BourdieuP. (1975). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction: Studies in the learning sciences. Paris, France: OECD.
5.
BrommerM.GrattoC.GravanderJ.TuttleM. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 265–280.
6.
BronzaftA. L.StuartI. R.BlumB. (1973). Test anxiety and cheating on college examinations. Psychological Reports, 32, 149–150.
7.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
DavyJ. A.KincaidJ. F.SmithK. J.TrawickM. A. (2007). An examination of the role of attitudinal characteristics and motivation on the cheating behavior of business students. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 281–302.
10.
DeutschM. (1979). Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems. American Psychologist, 34, 391–401.
11.
ElliotA. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
12.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
13.
ElliotA. J.MollerA. (2003). Performance-approach goals: Good or bad forms of regulation?International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 339–356.
14.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 613–628.
FerrellO. C.GreshamL. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.
17.
FlynnS.ReichardM.SlaneS. (1987). Cheating as a function of task outcome and Machiavellianism. Journal of Psychology, 121, 423–427.
18.
FriedmanM.FriedmanR. D. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GallantB. T.DrinanP. (2006). Organizational theory and student cheating: Explanations, responses and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 839–860.
20.
GrouzetF. M. E.KasserT.AhuviaA.Fernandez-DolsJ. M.KimY.LauS.. . . SheldonK. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800–816.
21.
HardingT. S.CarpenterD. D.FinelliC. J.PassowH. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311–324.
22.
HarveyH. W.SimsH. P.Jr. (1978). Organizational philosophy, politics, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 331–338.
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
JordanA. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 233–247.
25.
KasserT.AhuviaA. C. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 137–146.
26.
KasserT.CohnS.KannerA. D.RyanR. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22.
27.
KasserT.VansteenkisteM.DeckopJ. R. (2006). The ethical problems of a materialistic value orientation for businesses (and some suggestions for alternatives). In DeckopJ. R. (Ed.), Human resource management ethics (pp. 283–306). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
28.
KingG. (1988). Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 838–863.
29.
LawsonR. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “real world”?Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189–199.
30.
LobelT. E.LevanonI. (1988). Self-esteem, need for approval, and cheating behavior in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 122–123.
31.
Lovett-HooperG.WestonR. M. K.DollingerS. J. (2007). Is plagiarism a forerunner of other deviance? Imagined futures of academically dishonest students. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 323–336.
32.
MaioG. R.PakizehA.CheungW.ReesK. J. (2009). Changing, priming, and acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 699–715.
33.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
34.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 211–234.
35.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219–232.
36.
McHoskeyJ. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267–283.
37.
MertonR. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
38.
MillerA. G.GordonA. K.BuddieA. M. (1999). Accounting for evil and cruelty: Is to explain to condone?Social Psychological Review, 3, 254–268.
39.
MollerA. C.ElliotA. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In MitelA. V. (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology research (pp. 307–326). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
40.
MurdockT. B.MillerA. D.GoetzingerA. (2007). Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: Mediating and moderating processes. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.
41.
NonisS.SwiftC. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 69–77.
OsgoodD. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.
44.
RettingerD. A.JordanA. E.PeschieraF. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45, 873–890.
45.
RheeR. J. (2009). The Madoff scandal, market regulatory failure, and the business education of lawyers (University of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-30). Journal of Corporation Law, 35. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1407922
46.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
47.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
48.
SchwartzS. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In SeligmanC.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
SchwartzS. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: théorie, mesures et applications [Basic personal values: Theory, measures and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 129–168.
50.
SchwartzS. H. (2007). Cultural and individual value correlates of capitalism: A comparative analysis. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 52–57.
51.
SchwartzS. H.MelechG.LehmannA.BurgessS.HarrisM.OwensV. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.
52.
SimsR. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.
53.
TeixeiraA. C.RochaM. F. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: An exploratory international assessment. Higher Education, 59, 663–701.
54.
TrevinoL. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.
55.
TumberH. (2004). Scandal and media in the United Kingdom. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1122–1137.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
