BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. doi:10.1177/0956797611434748
2.
BrandmanT.YovelG. (2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10534–10540. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010
3.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.MaassA.FörsterJ.SuitnerC. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1890
4.
MaurerD.Le GrandR.MondlochC. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
5.
NussbaumM. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
StekelenburgJ. J.de GelderB. (2004). The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effect. NeuroReport, 15, 777–780. doi:10.1097/00001756-200404090-00007
8.
TarrM. J. (2013). Perception isn’t so simple. Commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012). Psychological Science, 24, 1069–1070.
9.
YovelG.PelcT.LubetskyI. (2010). It’s all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 759–767. doi:10.1037/a0017451