Perceptual Determinants Are Critical,but They Don’t Explain Everything

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernard

Gervais

S. J.

Allen

Campomizzi

Klein

(2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. doi:10.1177/0956797611434748

Brandman

Yovel

(2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10534–10540. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010

Gervais

S. J.

Vescio

T. K.

Maass

Förster

Suitner

(2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1890

Maurer

Le Grand

Mondloch

C. J.

(2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4

Nussbaum

(1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x

Reed

C. L.

Stone

Bozova

Tanaka

(2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302–308. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.73

Stekelenburg

J. J.

de Gelder

(2004). The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effect. NeuroReport, 15, 777–780. doi:10.1097/00001756-200404090-00007

Tarr

M. J.

(2013). Perception isn’t so simple. Commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012). Psychological Science, 24, 1069–1070.

Yovel

Pelc

Lubetsky

(2010). It’s all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 759–767. doi:10.1037/a0017451