BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. doi:10.1177/0956797611434748
2.
BertaminiM.MunafoR. (2012). Bite-size science and its undesired side effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 67–71. doi:10.1177/1745691611429353
FolkM. D.LuceR. D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 395–404.
5.
GauthierI.BehrmannM.TarrM. J. (1999). Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 349–370.
6.
HaywardW. G.TarrM. J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511–1521.
7.
HaywardW. G.TarrM. J. (2000). Differing views on views: Comments on Biederman and Bar (1999). Vision Research, 40, 3895–3899.
8.
JolicoeurP.MillikenB. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 200–210.
9.
LawsonR.HumphreysG. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395–416.
10.
LedgerwoodA.ShermanW. (2012). Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 60–66. doi:10.1177/1745691611427304
11.
RossionB. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
12.
ShepardR. N.CooperL. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
TarrM. J.BülthoffH. H.ZabinskiM.BlanzV. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint?Psychological Science, 8, 282–289.
14.
TarrM. J.PinkerS. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233–282.
15.
TarrM. J.PinkerS. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame?Psychological Science, 1, 253–256.
16.
YinR. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.