Simple decisions require the processing and evaluation of perceptual and cognitive information, the formation of a decision, and often the execution of a motor response. This process involves the accumulation of evidence over time until a particular choice reaches a decision threshold. Using a random-dot-motion stimulus, we showed that simply delaying responses after the stimulus offset can almost double accuracy, even in the absence of new incoming visual information. However, under conditions in which the otherwise blank interval was filled with a sensory mask or concurrent working memory load was high, performance gains were lost. Further, memory and perception showed equivalent rates of evidence accumulation, suggesting a high-capacity memory store. We propose an account of continued evidence accumulation by sequential sampling from a simultaneously decaying memory trace. Memories typically decay with time, hence immediate inquiry trumps later recall from memory. However, the results we report here show the inverse: Inspecting a memory trumps viewing the actual object.
BradleyC.PearsonJ. (2012). The sensory components of high-capacity iconic memory and visual working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 355. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00355
2.
BrittenK. H.ShadlenM. N.NewsomeW. T.MovshonJ. A. (1992). The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4745–4765.
3.
BurrD. C.SantoroL. (2001). Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds. Vision Research, 41, 1891–1899. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00072-4
4.
ChurchlandA. K.KianiR.ShadlenM. N. (2008). Decision-making with multiple alternatives. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 693–702. doi:10.1038/nn.2123
ColtheartM.LeaC. D.ThompsonK. (1974). In defence of iconic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 633–641. doi:10.1080/14640747408400456
7.
DickA. O. (1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 575–596.
8.
DiederichA. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260–274. doi:10.1006/jmps.1997.1167
9.
EnnsJ. T.Di LolloV. (2000). What’s new in visual masking?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345–352. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01520-5
10.
GoldJ. I.ShadlenM. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535–574. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038
11.
KianiR.HanksT. D.ShadlenM. N. (2008). Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3017–3029. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4761-07.2008
LamingD. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times. London, England: Academic Press.
14.
LeiteF. P.RatcliffR. (2010). Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 246–273. doi:10.3758/app.72.1.246
15.
LemusL.HernándezA.LunaR.ZainosA.NácherV.RomoR. (2007). Neural correlates of a postponed decision report. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 17174–17179. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707961104
16.
LinkS. W.HeathR. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77–105.
17.
LoftusG. R.DuncanJ.GehrigP. (1992). On the time course of perceptual information that results from a brief visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 530–549. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.530
18.
LongG. M. (1980). Iconic memory: A review and critique of the study of short-term visual storage. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 785–820. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.785
19.
LuZ.-L.NeuseJ.MadiganS.DosherB. A. (2005). Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive impairments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 1797–1802. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408402102
20.
MateeffS.DimitrovG.GenovaB.LikovaL.StefanovaM.HohnsbeinJ. (2000). The discrimination of abrupt changes in speed and direction of visual motion. Vision Research, 40, 409–415. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00185-6
21.
PachellaR. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In KantowitzB. (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and recognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
PalmerJ.HukA. C.ShadlenM. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5(5), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/5/1.full
23.
PasternakT.GreenleeM. W. (2005). Working memory in primate sensory systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 97–107. doi:10.1038/nrn1603
24.
PersuhM.GenzerB.MelaraR. D. (2012). Iconic memory requires attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–8.
25.
PhiliastidesM. G.AuksztulewiczR.HeekerenH. R.BlankenburgF. (2011). Causal role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human perceptual decision making. Current Biology, 21, 980–983. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.034
26.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922.
27.
RatcliffR.RouderJ. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067
28.
ResulajA.KianiR.WolpertD. M.ShadlenM. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461, 263–266. doi:10.1038/nature08275
29.
RoitmanJ. D.ShadlenM. N. (2002). Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9475–9489.
30.
ShadlenM. N.NewsomeW. T. (1996). Motion perception: Seeing and deciding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 628–633.
31.
ShadlenM. N.NewsomeW. T. (2001). Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1916–1936.
32.
SmithP. L.VickersD. (1988). The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 135–168. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(88)90043-0
33.
SmithsonH.MollonJ. (2006). Do masks terminate the icon?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 150–160.
34.
SpencerT. J. (1969). Some effects of different masking stimuli on iconic storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 132–140. doi:10.1037/h0027472
35.
SperlingG. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 498), 1–29.
36.
StoneM. (1960). Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251–260. doi:10.1007/bf02289729
37.
TownsendJ. T.AshbyF. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
TurveyM. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1–52. doi:10.1037/h0033872
39.
UsherM.McClellandJ. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550
40.
WickelgrenW. A. (1972). Trace resistance and the decay of long-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 418–455. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(72)90015-6
41.
WickelgrenW. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
