AronsonE.MillsJ. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177–181.
2.
AtranS.HenrichJ. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory, 5, 18–30.
3.
ChoiJ.BowlesS. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640.
4.
ClingingsmithD.KhwajaD.KremerM. (2009). Estimating the impact of the Hajj: Religion and tolerance in Islam’s global gathering. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1133–1170.
5.
DurkheimÉ. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse [The elementary forms of religious life]. Paris, France: Alcan.
6.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identification model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
8.
GingesJ.HansenI.NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224–230.
9.
HadjistavropoulosT.CraigK. D.DuckS.CanoA.GoubertL.JacksonP. L.FitzgeraldT. D. (2011). A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 910–939.
10.
HenrichJ. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30, 244–260.
11.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.
12.
IronsW. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In NesseR. (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
KonvalinkaI.XygalatasD.BulbuliaJ.SchjoedtU.JegindøE.-M.WallotS. . . . RoepstorffA. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 8514–8519.
14.
NgT.-W. C.VerkuytenM. (2010). Intergroup evaluations, group indispensability and prototypicality judgments: A study in Mauritius. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 621–638.
15.
NorenzayanA.ShariffA. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.
16.
OlivolaC. Y.ShafirE. (2013). The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 91–105. doi:10.1002/bdm.767
17.
SosisR. (2003). Why aren’t we all Hutterites?Human Nature, 14, 91–127.
18.
SosisR.BresslerE. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 211–239.
19.
TajfelH. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 695–715). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.