Shifting Selection May Control Apparent Motion

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashida

Seiffert

Osaka

(2001). Inefficient visual search for second-order motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 18, 2255–2266.

Cavanagh

(1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563–1565.

Cavanagh

(2004). Attention routines and the architecture of selection. In Posner

(Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 13–28). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Drew

Horowitz

T. S.

Wolfe

J. M.

Vogel

E. K.

(2011). Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 659–668.

Z.-L.

Sperling

(1995). Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature, 377, 237–239.

Luck

S. J.

Kappenman

E. S.

(2011). Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Verstraten

F. A. J.

Cavanagh

Labianca

(2000). Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research, 40, 3651–3664.

Y. Q.

Franconeri

S. L.

(2012). The head of the table: Marking the “front” of an object is tightly linked with selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 1408–1412.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB