Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How do people represent object meaning? It is now uncontentious that thinking about manipulable objects (e.g., pencils) activates brain regions underlying action. But is this activation part of the meaning of these objects, or is it merely incidental? The research we report here shows that when the hands are engaged in a task involving motions that are incompatible with those used to interact with frequently manipulated objects, it is more difficult to think about those objects—but not harder to think about infrequently manipulated objects (e.g., bookcases). Critically, the amount of manual experience with the object determines the amount of interference. These findings show that brain activity underlying manual action is part of, not peripheral to, the representation of frequently manipulated objects. Further, they suggest that people’s ability to think about an object changes dynamically on the basis of the match between their (experience-based) mental representation of its meaning and whatever they are doing at that moment.

Keywords

embodied cognition semantic representations individual experience simulation action concepts cognition semantic memory cognitive neuroscience language meaning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

D. A.

(1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In Newman

S. K.

Epstein

(Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 207–244). Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.

Anderson

S. E.

Spivey

M. J.

(2009). The enactment of language: Decades of interactions between linguistic and motor processes. Language and Cognition, 1, 87–111.

Bak

T. H.

Yancopoulou

Nestor

P. J.

Xuereb

J. H.

Spillantini

M. G.

Pulvermüller

Hodges

J. R.

(2006). Clinical, imaging and pathological correlates of a hereditary deficit in verb and action processing. Brain, 129, 321–332.

Beilock

S. L.

Lyons

I. M.

Mattarella-Micke

Nusbaum

H. C.

Small

S. L.

(2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 13269–13273.

Boulenger

Mechtouff

Thobois

Broussolle

Jeannerod

Nazir

T. A.

(2008). Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46, 743–756.

Bub

D. N.

Masson

M. E. J.

(2012). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 502–517.

Bub

D. N.

Masson

M. E. J.

Bukach

C. M.

(2003). Gesturing and naming: The use of functional knowledge in object identification. Psychological Science, 14, 467–472.

Campanella

Shallice

(2011). Manipulability and object recognition: Is manipulability a semantic feature? Experimental Brain Research, 208, 369–383. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2489-7

Casasanto

Chrysikou

E. G.

(2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 419–422.

10.

Chao

L. L.

Martin

(2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.

11.

Cotelli

Borroni

Manenti

Zanetti

Arévalo

Cappa

S. F.

Padovani

(2007). Action and object naming in Parkinson’s disease without dementia. European Journal of Neurology, 14, 632–637.

12.

Damasio

A. R.

Tranel

(1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 90, 4957–4960.

13.

Farah

M. J.

Hammond

K. H.

(1988). Mental rotation and orientation-invariant object recognition: Dissociable processes. Cognition, 29, 29–46.

14.

Gauthier

Hayward

W. G.

Tarr

M. J.

Anderson

A. W.

Skudlarski

Gore

J. C.

(2002). BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron, 34, 161–171.

15.

Glenberg

A. M.

Sato

Cattaneo

(2008). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291.

16.

Helbig

H. B.

Graf

Kiefer

(2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221–228.

17.

Helbig

H. B.

Steinwender

Graf

Kiefer

(2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200(3–4), 251–258.

18.

Kan

I. P.

Kable

J. W.

Van Scoyoc

Chatterjee

Thompson-Schill

S. L.

(2006). Fractionating the left frontal response to tools: Dissociable effects of motor experience and lexical competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 267–277.

19.

Kiefer

Sim

E.-J.

Helbig

H. B.

Graf

(2011). Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: Evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1864–1874.

20.

Kiefer

Sim

E.-J.

Liebich

Hauk

Tanaka

(2007). Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 525–542.

21.

Mahon

B. Z.

Caramazza

(2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology—Paris, 102, 59–70.

22.

Myung

Blumstein

S. E.

Sedivy

J. C.

(2006). Playing on the typewriter and typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98, 223–243. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010

23.

Myung

Blumstein

S. E.

Yee

Sedivy

J. C.

Thompson-Schill

S. L.

Buxbaum

L. J.

(2010). Impaired access to manipulation features in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain & Language, 112, 101–112.

24.

Negri

G. A. L.

Rumiati

R. I.

Zadini

Ukmar

Mahon

B. Z.

Caramazza

(2007). What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 795–816.

25.

Neininger

Pulvermüller

(2003). Word-category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 41, 53–70.

26.

Pobric

Jefferies

Lambon Ralph

M. A.

(2010). Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Current Biology, 20, 964–968.

27.

Pulvermüller

(2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517–524.

28.

Pulvermüller

Hauk

Nikuli

V. V.

Ilmoniemi

R. J.

(2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.

29.

Shebani

Pulvermüller

(2013). Moving the hands and feet specifically impairs working memory for arm- and leg-related action words. Cortex, 49, 222–231.

30.

Tucker

Ellis

(2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185–203.

31.

Walenski

Mostofsky

S. H.

Ullman

M. T.

(2007). Speeded processing of grammar and tool knowledge in Tourette’s syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2447–2460.

32.

Weber

M. J.

Thompson-Schill

S. L.

(2010). Functional neuroimaging can support causal claims about brain function. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2415–2416.

33.

Weisberg

Turennout

Martin

(2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 513–521. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj176

34.

Willems

R. M.

Hagoort

Casasanto

(2010). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21, 67–74.

35.

Witt

J. K.

Kemmerer

Linkenauger

S. A.

Culham

(2010). A functional role for motor simulation in naming tools. Psychological Science, 21, 1215–1219.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material