Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous research suggests that there is a limit to the rate at which items can be consolidated in visual short-term memory (VSTM). This limit could be due to either a serial or a limited-capacity parallel process. Historically, it has proven difficult to distinguish between these two types of processes. In the present experiment, we took a novel approach that allowed us to do so. Participants viewed two oriented gratings either sequentially or simultaneously and reported one of the gratings’ orientation via method of adjustment. Performance was worse for the simultaneous than for the sequential condition. We fit the data with a mixture model that assumes performance is limited by a noisy memory representation plus random guessing. Critically, the serial and limited-capacity parallel processes made distinct predictions regarding the model’s guessing and memory-precision parameters. We found strong support for a serial process, which implies that one can consolidate only a single orientation into VSTM at a time.

Keywords

visual memory visual perception visual short-term memory serial process parallel process

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballard

D. H.

Hayhoe

M. M.

Pelz

J. B.

(1995). Memory representation in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66–80.

Chun

M. M.

Potter

M. C.

(1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.

Dell’Acqua

Jolicœur

(2000). Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 184–191.

Duncan

(1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.

Hoffman

J. E.

(1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 1–11.

Jolicœur

Dell’Acqua

(1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202.

Logan

G. D.

(2002). Parallel and serial processing. In Wixted

(Ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 271–300). New York, NY: Wiley.

Luck

S. J.

Vogel

E. K.

(1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.

Mance

Becker

M. W.

Liu

(2012). Parallel consolidation of simple features into visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 429–438.

10.

Myung

I. J.

(2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100.

11.

O’Regan

J. K.

(1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488.

12.

Pashler

(1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.

13.

Phillips

W. A.

(1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.

14.

Postle

B. R.

(2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23– 38.

15.

Raftery

(1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.

16.

Ranganath

(2006). Working memory for visual objects: Complementary roles of inferior temporal, medial temporal, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience, 139, 277– 289.

17.

Scharff

Palmer

Moore

C. M.

(2011a). Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 713–721.

18.

Scharff

Palmer

Moore

C. M.

(2011b). Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 813–833.

19.

Shiffrin

R. M.

Gardner

G. T.

(1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 72–82.

20.

Townsend

J. T.

(1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46–54.

21.

Townsend

J. T.

Wenger

M. J.

(2004). The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 391–418.

22.

Vogel

E. K.

Woodman

G. F.

Luck

S. J.

(2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1436–1451.

23.

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.

24.

Zhang

Luck

S. J.

(2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233– 235.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.36 MB

Serial Consolidation of Orientation Information Into Visual Short-Term Memory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material