Researchers assert that affective responses to seemingly minor daily events have long-term implications for mental health, yet this phenomenon has rarely been investigated. In the current study, we examined how levels of daily negative affect and affective reactivity in response to daily stressors predicted general affective distress and self-reported anxiety and depressive disorders 10 years after they were first assessed. Across eight consecutive evenings, participants (N = 711; age = 25 to 74 years) reported their daily stressors and their daily negative affect. Increased levels of negative affect on nonstressor days were related to general affective distress and symptoms of an affective disorder 10 years later. Heightened affective reactivity to daily stressors predicted greater general affective distress and an increased likelihood of reporting an affective disorder. These findings suggest that the average levels of negative affect that people experience and how they respond to seemingly minor events in their daily lives have long-term implications for their mental health.
AlmeidaD. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 64–68. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
2.
AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE.KesslerR. C. (2002). The Daily Inventory of Stressful Events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55. doi:10.1177/ 1073191102091006
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BeckA. T.RushA. J.ShawB. F.EmeryG. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890
6.
BylsmaL. M.MorrisB. H.RottenbergJ. (2008). A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 676–691. doi:10.1016/ j.cpr.2007.10.001
7.
CaspiA.HaririA. R.HolmesA.UherR.MoffittT. E. (2010). Genetic sensitivity to the environment: The case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 509–527. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101452
8.
CranfordJ.ShroutP.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2 .276
11.
DunkleyD. M.SanislowC. A.GriloC. M.McGlashanT. H. (2009). Self-criticism versus neuroticism in predicting depression and psychosocial impairment for 4 years in a clinical sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50, 335–346. doi:10.1016/ j.comppsych.2008.09.004
12.
GrossJ. J.SuttonS. K.KetelaarT. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279–288. doi:10.1177/0146167298243005
HowellR. T.RodzonK. S. (2011). An exploration of personality– affect relations in daily life: Determining the support for the affect-level and affect-reactivity views. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 797–801. doi:10.1016/j .paid.2011.06.020
15.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS.-L. T. . . . ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976. doi:10.1017/S0033291702006074
16.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.MroczekD.UstunT. B.WittchenH.-U. (1998). The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 7, 171–185. doi:10.1002/mpr.47
17.
KoernerS. S.KenyonD. B. (2007). Understanding “good days” and “bad days”: Emotional and physical reactivity among caregivers for elder relatives. Family Relations, 56, 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00435.x
18.
ManciniA. D.BonannoG. A.ClarkA. E. (2011). Stepping off the hedonic treadmill: Individual differences in response to major life events. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 144–152. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000047
19.
McEwenB. S. (2006). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Neuroimmunomodulation, Molecular Aspects, Integrative Systems, and Clinical Advances, 840, 33–44.
20.
MroczekD. K.AlmeidaD. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355–378. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00265.x
21.
NarrowW. E.RaeD. S.RobinsL. N.RegierD. A. (2002). Revised prevalence estimates of mental disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 115–123.
22.
NietzscheF. W. (2007). Ecce homo. In LudoviciA. M. (Trans.), Twilight of the idols with the antichrist and ecce homo. Hertfordshire, England: Wordsworth Editions. (Original work published 1911)
23.
O’NeillS. C.CohenL. H.TolpinL. H.GunthertK. C. (2004). Affective reactivity to daily interpersonal stressors as a prospective predictor of depressive symptoms. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 172–194. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.2.172.31015
24.
ParrishB. P.CohenL. H.LaurenceauJ. P. (2011). Prospective relationship between negative affective reactivity to daily stress and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 30, 270–296. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.2.172.31015
25.
PeetersF.BerkhofJ.RottenbergJ.NicolsonN. A. (2010). Ambulatory emotional reactivity to negative daily life events predicts remission from major depressive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 754–760. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010 .04.008
26.
PiazzaJ.CharlesS. T. (2006). Mental health and the baby boomers. In WhitbourneS. K.WillisS. L. (Eds.), The baby boomers grow up: Contemporary perspectives on midlife (pp. 111–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
RobertsS. B.KendlerK. S. (1999). Neuroticism and self-esteem as indices of the vulnerability to major depression in women. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1101–1109.
29.
SAS Institute. (2001). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: Author.
30.
SliwinskiM. J.AlmeidaD. M.SmythJ.StawskiR. S. (2009). Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: Findings from two measurement-burst diary studies. Psychology and Aging, 24, 828–840. doi:10.1037/a0017925
31.
SteunenbergB.BeekmanA. T. F.DeegD. J. H.KerkhofA. J. F. M. (2010). Personality predicts recurrence of late-life depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 123, 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.002
32.
SulsJ.GreenP.HillisS. (1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 127–136. doi:10.1177/ 0146167298242002
33.
VansteelandtK.Van MechelenI.NezlekJ. B. (2005). The co-occurrence of emotions in daily life: A multilevel approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 325–335. doi:10.1016/ j.jrp.2004.05.006
34.
WichersM.GeschwindN.JacobsN.KenisG.PeetersF.DeromC. . . . van OsJ. (2009). Transition from stress sensitivity to a depressive state: Longitudinal twin study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 498–503. doi:10.1192/bjp .bp.108.056853
35.
WrightJ. H.BeckA. T.ThaseM. E. (2002). Cognitive therapy. In HalesR. E.YudofskyS. C.TalbottJ. A. (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 1245–1284). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
