CarelloC.TurveyM. T. (2000). Rotational invariants and dynamic touch. In HellerM. A. (Ed.), Touch, representation, and blindness (pp. 27–66). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
CarlsonT. A.AlvarezG.WuD.-a.VerstratenF. A. J. (2010). Rapid assimilation of external objects into the body schema. Psychological Science, 21, 1000–1005. doi:10.1177/0956797610371962
3.
DaviesP. (1973). Effects of movements upon the appearance and duration of a prolonged visual afterimage: 1. Changes arising from the movement of a portion of the body incorporated in the afterimaged scene. Perception, 2, 147–153.
4.
GibsonJ. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
GregoryR. L.WallaceJ. G.CampbellF. W. (1959). Changes in the size and shape of visual after-images observed in complete darkness during changes of position in space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 54–55.
6.
HogendoornH.KammersM. P. M.CarlsonT. A.VerstratenF. A. J. (2009). Being in the dark about your hand: Resolution of visuo-proprioceptive conflict by disowning visible limbs. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2698–2703. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.014
7.
IrikiA.TanakaM.IwamuraY. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.
8.
TurveyM. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134–1152.
9.
TurveyM. T.CarelloC. (2011). Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 3123–3132. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0159