Covert Painting Simulations Influence Aesthetic Appreciation of Artworks

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beilock

S. L.

Holt

L. E.

(2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51–57.

Calvo-Merino

Urgesi

Orgs

Aglioti

S. M.

Haggard

(2010). Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 447–456.

Cupchik

G. C.

(1992). From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In Cupchik

G. C.

Laszlo

(Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp. 61–81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Currie

(2011). Empathy for objects. In Coplan

Goldie

(Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 82–97). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Dutton

(2009). The art instinct. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Freedberg

Gallese

(2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 197–203.

Leder

Belke

Oeberst

Augustin

(2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.

Lee

(1913). The beautiful: An introduction to psychological aesthetics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26942/26942-h/26942-h.htm

Lipps

(1903). Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst [Psychology of beauty and the arts]. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag Leopold Voss.

10.

Paladino

M. P.

Mazzurega

Pavani

Schubert

(2010). Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychological Science, 21, 1202–1207.

11.

Reber

Norenzayan

(2010). The shared fluency theory of social cohesiveness. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1702407

12.

Reber

Schwarz

Winkielman

(2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.

13.

Reed

C. L.

Farah

M. J.

(1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 334–343.

14.

Taylor

J. E. T.

Witt

J. K.

Grimaldi

P. J.

(2012). Uncovering the connection between artist and audience: Viewing painted brushstrokes evokes corresponding action representations in the observer. Cognition, 125, 26–36.

15.

Topolinski

(2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220–1224.

16.

Topolinski

(2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 260–281.

17.

Topolinski

Strack

(2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423–433.

18.

Topolinski

Strack

(2010). False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 721–733.

19.

Tucker

Ellis

(1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.

20.

Wilthermuth

S. S.

Heath

(2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB