Just as modern economies undergo periods of boom and bust, human ancestors experienced cycles of abundance and famine. Is the adaptive response when resources become scarce to save for the future or to spend money on immediate gains? Drawing on life-history theory, we propose that people’s responses to resource scarcity depend on the harshness of their early-life environment, as reflected by childhood socioeconomic status (SES). In the three experiments reported here, we tested how people from different childhood environments responded to resource scarcity. We found that people who grew up in lower-SES environments were more impulsive, took more risks, and approached temptations more quickly. Conversely, people who grew up in higher-SES environments were less impulsive, took fewer risks, and approached temptations more slowly. Responses similarly diverged according to people’s oxidative-stress levels—a urinary biomarker of cumulative stress exposure. Overall, whereas tendencies associated with early-life environments were dormant in benign conditions, they emerged under conditions of economic uncertainty.
Alonso-AlvarezC.BertrandS.DeveveyG.GaillardM.ProstJ.FaivreB.SorciG. (2004). Increased susceptibility to oxidative stress as a proximate cost of reproduction. Ecology Letters, 7, 363–368.
2.
BelskyJ.HoutsR. M.FearonR. M. P. (2010). Infant attachment security and timing of puberty: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Psychological Science, 21, 1195–1201.
3.
BelskyJ.SchlomerG. L.EllisB. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673.
4.
BelskyJ.SteinbergL.DraperP. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647– 670.
5.
CarrollC. D.HallR. E.ZeldesS. P. (1992). The buffer-stock theory of saving: Some macroeconomic evidence. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 23, 61–156.
6.
ChakravarthyM. V.BoothF. W. (2004). Eating, exercise, and “thrifty” genotypes: Connecting the dots toward an evolutionary understanding of modern chronic diseases. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96, 3–10.
7.
ChenM.BarghJ. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral dispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.
8.
ChisholmJ. S.EllisonP. T.EvansJ.LeeP. C.LiebermanL. S.PavlikZ.. . . WorthmanC. M. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1–24.
9.
Del GiudiceM. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.
10.
DowlingD. K.SimmonsL. W. (2009). Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1737–1745.
11.
EllisB. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920–958.
12.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T.BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28.
13.
EllisB. J.FigueredoA. J.BrumbachB. H.SchlomerG. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.
14.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SefcekJ. A.KirsnerB. R.JacobsW. J. (2005). The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1349–1360.
GreenL.MyersonJ. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.
17.
GriskeviciusV.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E.TyburJ. M. (2011). Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 241–254.
18.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.AckermanJ. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E.WhiteA. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 69–80.
19.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015–1026.
20.
HillK.KaplanH. (1999). Life history traits in humans: Theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 397–430.
21.
HillS. E.RodehefferC.GriskeviciusV.DuranteK.WhiteA. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 275–291.
22.
JablonkaE.RazG. (2009). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 84, 131–176.
23.
KaplanH. S.GangestadS. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L.SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292–314.
25.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.SundieJ. M.LiN. P.LiY. J.NeubergS. L. (2009). Deep rationality: The evolutionary economics of decision making. Social Cognition, 27, 764–785.
26.
KuzawaC. W.McDadeT. W.AdairL. S.LeeN. (2010). Rapid weight gain after birth predicts life history and reproductive strategy in Filipino males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 16800–16805.
27.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.. . . BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.
28.
LowB. S.HazelA.ParkerN.WelchK. B. (2008). Influences on women’s reproductive lives: Unexpected ecological underpinnings. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 201–219.
29.
MillerG. E.ChenE.FokA. K.WalkerH.LimA.NichollsE. F.. . . KoborM. S. (2009). Low early-life social class leaves a biological residue manifested by decreased glucocorticoid and increased proinflammatory signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 14716–14721.
30.
MortensenC. R.BeckerD. V.AckermanJ. M.NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T. (2010). Infection breeds reticence: The effects of disease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science, 21, 440–447.
31.
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010). US business cycle expansions and contractions. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/cycles.html
32.
NettleD. (2010). Dying young and living fast: Variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 387–395.
33.
PromislowD. E. L.HarveyP. H. (1990). Living fast and dying young: A comparative analysis of life-history variation among mammals. Journal of Zoology, 220, 417–437.
34.
RoffD. A. (2002). Life history evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
35.
SimpsonJ. A.GriskeviciusV.KuoS. I.SungS.CollinsW. A. (2012). Evolution, stress, and sensitive periods: The influence of unpredictability in early versus late childhood on sex and risky behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48, 674– 686.
36.
StearnsS. (1992). The evolution of life histories. Cambridge, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
TinbergenN. (1963). On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.
38.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1997). Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighborhoods. British Medical Journal, 314, 1271–1274.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
