In Western dualistic culture, it is assumed that thoughts cannot be treated as material objects; however, language is replete with metaphorical analogies suggesting otherwise. In the research reported here, we examined whether objectifying thoughts can influence whether the thoughts are used in subsequent evaluations. In Experiment 1, participants wrote about what they either liked or disliked about their bodies. Then, the paper on which they wrote their thoughts was either ripped up and tossed in the trash or kept and checked for errors. When participants physically discarded a representation of their thoughts, they mentally discarded them as well, using them less in forming judgments than did participants who retained a representation of their thoughts. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and also showed that people relied on their thoughts more when they physically kept them in a safe place—putting their thoughts in their pockets—than when they discarded them. A final study revealed that these effects were stronger when the action was performed physically rather than merely imagined.
AbelsonR. P. (1986). Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 16, 223–250.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
3.
AndersonC. A. (1983). Imagination and expectation: The effect of imagining behavioral scripts on personal intentions. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 30–56.
4.
BaerR. A. (Ed.). (2006). Mindfulness-based treatment approaches: A clinician’s guide to evidence base and applications. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
5.
BeckA. T. (1993). Cognitive therapy: Past, present, and future. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 194–198.
6.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 69–118). New York, NY: Elsevier.
7.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.TormalaZ. L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200–206.
8.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M.CreswellJ. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.
DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877.
11.
EllisA. (1973). Rational-emotive therapy. In JurjevichR. M. (Ed.), Direct psychotherapies (pp. 295–331). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.
12.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
GawronskiB.DeutschR.MbirkouS.SeibtB.StrackF. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377.
14.
GreenwaldA. G.AlbertR. D. (1968). Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 31–34.
15.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.
16.
HayesS. C.StrosahlK. D. (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
17.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
19.
KilleyaL. A.JohnsonB. T. (1998). Experimental induction of biased systematic processing: The directed-thought technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 17–33.
20.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
LearyM. R.AdamsC. E.TateE. B. (2006). Hypo-egoic self-regulation: Exercising self-control by diminishing the influence of the self. Journal of Personality, 74, 1803–1831.
22.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V.MilneA. B.WheelerV. (1996). On resisting the temptation for simplification: Counter-intentional effects of stereotype suppression on social memory. Social Cognition, 14, 1–20.
23.
MaioG. R.ThomasG. (2007). The epistemic-teleologic model of deliberate self-persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 46–67.
24.
MartinL. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493–504.
25.
MonteithM. J.ShermanJ. W.DevineP. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63–82.
26.
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception and emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
27.
PeckJ.ShuS. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 434–447.
28.
PerloffR. M.BrockT. C. (1980). And thinking makes it so: Cognitive responses to persuasion. In RoloffM. E.MillerG. R. (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in theory and research (pp. 67–99). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
PetrovaP. K.CialdiniR. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 442–452.
30.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.
31.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.WegenerD. T. (2007). The role of metacognition in social judgment. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
RobbinsP.AydedeM. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SchwarzN.BlessH. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In MartinL. L.TesserA. (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
SeminG. R.SmithE. R. (Eds.). (2008). Embodiment grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SparrowB.LiuJ.WegnerD. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778.
36.
StrackF.MussweilerT. (2001). Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals. In ForgasJ.WilliamsK. (Eds.), Social influence processes: Direct and indirect influences (pp. 199–212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37.
ThalerR. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60.
38.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
39.
Van DyneL.PierceJ. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.
40.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
WegnerD. M.ErberR. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 903–912.
42.
WillettW. C.SacksF.TrichopoulouA.DrescheR. G.Ferro-LuzziA.HelsingE.TrichopoulosD. (1995). Mediterranean diet pyramid: A cultural model for healthy eating. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61, 1402–1406.
43.
WilsonT. D.BrekkeN. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.
