Hindsight bias is the tendency to retrospectively think of outcomes as being more foreseeable than they actually were. It is a robust judgment bias and is difficult to correct (or “debias”). In the experiments reported here, we used a visual paradigm in which performers decided whether blurred photos contained humans. Evaluators, who saw the photos unblurred and thus knew whether a human was present, estimated the proportion of participants who guessed whether a human was present. The evaluators exhibited visual hindsight bias in a way that matched earlier data from judgments of historical events surprisingly closely. Using eye tracking, we showed that a higher correlation between the gaze patterns of performers and evaluators (shared attention) is associated with lower hindsight bias. This association was validated by a causal method for debiasing: Showing the gaze patterns of the performers to the evaluators as they viewed the stimuli reduced the extent of hindsight bias.
ArkesH. R.FaustD.GuilmetteT. J.HartK. (1988). Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 305–307.
2.
BernsteinD. M.ErdfelderE.MeltzoffA. N.PeriaW.LoftusG. R. (2011). Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 378–391.
3.
BernsteinD. M.HarleyE. M. (2007). Fluency misattribution and visual hindsight bias. Memory, 15, 548–560.
4.
BrunerJ. S.PotterM. C. (1964). Interference in visual recognition. Science, 144, 424–425.
5.
CamererC. F.LoewensteinG.WeberM. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232–1254.
6.
DaviesM. F. (1987). Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 50–68.
7.
ErdfelderE.BuchnerA. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387–414.
8.
FischhoffB. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
9.
FischhoffB. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349–358.
10.
FischhoffB.BeythR. (1975). “I knew it would happen”: Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1–16.
11.
FlemingS. M.DolanR. J. (2010). Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: Implications for measures of awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 352–363.
12.
GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GuilbaultR. L.BryantF. B.BrockwayJ. H.PosavacE. J. (2004). A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 103–117.
14.
HannulaD. E.AlthoffR. R.WarrenD. E.RiggsL.CohenN. J.RyanJ. D. (2010). Worth a glance: Using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–16.
15.
HarleyE. M. (2007). Hindsight bias in legal decision making. Social Cognition, 25, 48–63.
16.
HarleyE. M.CarlsenK. A.LoftusG. R. (2004). The “saw-it-all-along” effect: Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 960–968.
17.
HasherL.AttigM. S.AlbaJ. W. (1981). I knew it all along: Or, did I?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 86–96.
18.
HawkinsS. A.HastieR. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311–327.
19.
KanaiR.WalshV.TsengC.-H. (2010). Subjective discriminability of invisibility: A framework for distinguishing perceptual and attentional failures of awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1045–1057.
20.
KoriatA.LichtensteinS.FischhoffB. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.
21.
LitchfieldD.BallL. J.DonovanT.ManningD. J.CrawfordT. (2008). Learning from others: Effects of viewing another person’s eye movements while searching for chest nodules. In SahinerB.ManningD. J. (Eds.), Medical imaging 2008: Image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment (Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6917). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
22.
LoewensteinG.MooreD. A.WeberR. A. (2006). Misperceiving the value of information in predicting the performance of others. Experimental Economics, 9, 281–295.
23.
LordC. G.LepperM. R.PrestonE. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1243.
24.
MadaraszK. (2011). Information projection: Model and applications. The Review of Economic Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr044
25.
MehtaP.SadasivanS.GreensteinJ.GramopadhyeK.DuchowskiT. (2005, September). Evaluating different display techniques for communicating search strategy training in a collaborative virtual aircraft inspection environment. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.
26.
NestlerS.BlankH.EgloffB. (2010). Hindsight ≠ hindsight: Experimentally induced dissociations between hindsight components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1399–1413.
27.
PohlR. F. (2007). Ways to assess hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 14–31.
28.
PohlR. F.BenderM.LachmannG. (2002). Hindsight bias around the world. Experimental Psychology, 49, 270–282.
29.
PohlR. F.EisenhauerM.HardtO. (2003). SARA: A cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias. Memory, 11, 337–356.
30.
PohlR. F.HellW. (1996). No reduction of hindsight bias with complete information and repeated testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 49–58.
31.
RoeseN. J.FesselF.SummervilleA.KrugerJ.DilichM. A. (2006). The propensity effect: When foresight trumps hindsight. Psychological Science, 17, 305–310.
32.
SannaL. J.SchwarzN.StockerS. L. (2002). When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 497–502.
33.
SlovicP.FischhoffB. (1977). On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 544–551.
34.
StallardM. J.WorthingtonD. L. (1998). Reducing the hindsight bias utilizing attorney closing arguments. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 671–683.
35.
SteinR.BrennanS. E. (2004, October). Another person’s eye gaze as a cue in solving programming problems. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, State College, PA.
36.
StuddertD. M.MelloM. M.SageW. M.DesRochesC. M.PeughJ.ZapertK.BrennanT. A. (2005). Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 2609–2617.
37.
TerryK. (2011). What is smart sex offender policy?Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 275–282.
38.
VelichkovskyB. (1995). Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics & Cognition, 3, 199–224.
39.
WhittleseaB. W. A.LeboeJ. P. (2003). Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 62–79.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
