People often face outcomes of important events that are beyond their personal control, such as when they wait for an acceptance letter, job offer, or medical test results. We suggest that when wanting and uncertainty are high and personal control is lacking, people may be more likely to help others, as if they can encourage fate’s favor by doing good deeds proactively. Four experiments support this karmic-investment hypothesis. When people want an outcome over which they have little control, their donations of time and money increase (Experiments 1 and 2), but their participation in other rewarding activities does not (Experiment 1b). In addition, at a job fair, job seekers who feel the process is outside (vs. within) their control make more generous pledges to charities (Experiment 3). Finally, karmic investments increase optimism about a desired outcome (Experiment 4). We conclude by discussing the role of personal control and magical beliefs in this phenomenon.
AndreoniJ.ScholzJ. K. (1998). An econometric analysis of charitable giving with interdependent preferences. Economic Inquiry, 36, 410–428.
2.
BleakJ.FrederickC. M. (1998). Superstitious behavior in sport: Levels of effectiveness and determinants of use in three collegiate sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21, 1–15.
3.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
4.
CallanM. J.EllardJ. H.NicolJ. E. (2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646–1658.
5.
CallanM. J.KayA. C.DavidenkoN.EllardJ. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623.
6.
CallanM. J.SheadN. W.OlsonJ. M. (2009). Foregoing the labor for the fruits: The effect of just world threat on the desire for immediate monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 246–249.
7.
CallanM. J.SuttonR. M.DovaleC. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1100.
8.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.
9.
CialdiniR. B.DarbyB. L.VincentJ. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502–516.
10.
DamischL.StoberockB.MussweilerT. (2010). Keep your fingers crossed! How superstition improves performance. Psychological Science, 21, 1014–1020.
11.
EckbladM.ChapmanL. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.
12.
FriedlandN.KeinanG.RegevY. (1992). Controlling the uncontrollable: Effects of stress on illusory perceptions of controllability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 923–931.
13.
GaucherD.HaferC.KayA. C.DavidenkoN. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118.
14.
HaferC. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073.
15.
HaferC. L.BègueL. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.
16.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
17.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.
18.
KeinanG. (2002). The effects of stress and desire for control on superstitious behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 102–108.
19.
KogutT.RitovI. (2011). ‘Protective donation’: When refusing a request for a donation increases the sense of vulnerability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1059–1069.
20.
LangerE. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.
21.
LernerM. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.
22.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
23.
LernerM. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388–399.
24.
LernerM. J.GoldbergJ. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive systems. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 627–640). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
LernerM. J.SimmonsC. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.
26.
MalinowskiB. (1954). Magic, science and religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
27.
McGregorI.MarigoldD. C. (2003). Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 838–852.
28.
NemeroffC.RozinP. (2000). The makings of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In RosengrenK. S.JohnsonC. N.HarrisP. L. (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
ProninE.WegnerD. M.McCarthyK.RodriguezS. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218–231.
30.
ReedA.AquinoK.LevyE. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–185.
31.
RisenJ. L.GilovichT. (2008). Why people are reluctant to tempt fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 293–307.
32.
RosenhanD. L.SaloveyP.HargisP. (1981). The joys of helping: Focus of attention mediates the impact of positive affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 899–905.
33.
RozinP.NemeroffC. (2002). Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics.” In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive human judgment (pp. 201–216). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SchwartzC. E.SendorR. M. (1999). Helping others helps oneself: Response shift effects in peer support. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1563–1575.
35.
ShafirE.TverskyA. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequentialist reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474.
36.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
37.
TaylorS. E.GollwitzerP. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213–226.
38.
WhiteR. B. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
39.
ZitekE. M.JordanA. H.MoninB.LeachF. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255.
40.
ZusneL.JonesW. H. (1989). Anomalistic psychology: A study of magical thinking (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
