What effect does economic inequality have on academic integrity? Using data from search-engine queries made between 2003 and 2011 on Google and state-level measures of income inequality and generalized trust, I found that academically dishonest searches (queries seeking term-paper mills and help with cheating) were more likely to come from states with higher income inequality and lower levels of generalized trust. These relations persisted even when controlling for contextual variables, such as average income and the number of colleges per capita. The relation between income inequality and academic dishonesty was fully mediated by generalized trust. When there is higher economic inequality, people are less likely to view one another as trustworthy. This lower generalized trust, in turn, is associated with a greater prevalence of academic dishonesty. These results might explain previous findings on the effectiveness of honor codes.
CrownD. F.SpillerM. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.
4.
Deutsch-SalamonS.RobinsonS. (2008). Trust that binds: The impact of employee-perceived trust on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 593–601.
5.
DiekhoffG. M.LaBeffE. E.ClarkR. E.WilliamsL. E.FrancisB.HainesV. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37, 487–502.
6.
GinoF.AyalS.ArielyD. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393–398.
7.
GinoF.PierceL. (2009). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20, 1153–1160.
8.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.
9.
HarrellW. A.HartnagelT. (1976). The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Soci- ometry, 39, 157–165.
10.
Jong-SungY.KhagramS. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70, 136–157.
11.
KanerC.FiedlerR. L. (2008). A cautionary note on checking software engineering papers for plagiarism. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51, 184–188.
12.
McCabeD. L.ButterfieldK. D.TreviñoL. K. (2008). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305.
13.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
14.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219–232.
15.
McCabeD. L.TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43, 357–378.
MorganP.VaughnJ. (2010). The case of the pilfered paper: Implications of online writing assistance and web-based plagiarism detection services. Political Science & Politics, 43, 755–758.
18.
NannestadP. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.
19.
NonisS.SwiftC. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 69–77.
20.
OishiS.KesebirS.DienerE. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879– 891.
23.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
24.
UslanerE. M. (1999). Trust but verify: Social capital and moral behavior. Social Science Information, 38, 29–55.
25.
UslanerE. M.BrownM. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868–894.
26.
VowellP. R.ChenJ. (2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 226–249.
27.
WalkerJ. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 41–59.
28.
WestT.RavenscroftS.ShraderC. (2004). Cheating and moral judgment in the classroom: A natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 173–183.
29.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493–511.
