Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for animals (e.g., during mate selection, courtship, and avoidance of predators). In a study examining if and how animals classify different actions, a go/no-go procedure was used to train 4 pigeons to discriminate among “walking” and “running” digital animal models (each portrayed from 12 different viewpoints). Action discrimination acquired for two models significantly transferred to six novel animal models moving in novel and biomechanically characteristic ways. Randomization of frame order in the animated sequences, stimulus inversion, and static presentation all disrupted this discrimination, whereas changes in the direction and speed (both increases and decreases) of the actions did not. These results suggest that the pigeons discriminated the behaviors on the basis of generalized recognition of the models’ sequence of poses across time and provide the best evidence yet that animals use action categories to identify contrasting behavioral units.
AggarwalJ. K.CaiQ. (1999). Human motion analysis: A review. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73, 428–440.
2.
ArbibM. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 105–124.
3.
BhattR. S.WassermanE. A.ReynoldsW. F.KnaussK. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219–234.
BlakeR.ShiffrarM. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73.
6.
ByrneR. W.RussonA. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 667–684.
7.
CookR. G.BealeK.KobanA. C. (2011). Velocity-based motion categorization by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 175–188.
8.
CookR. G.MurphyM. S. (2012). Motion processing in birds. In LazarevaO. F.ShimizuT.WassermanE. A. (Eds.), How animals see the world: Behavior, biology, and evolution of vision (pp. 271–288). London, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
CookR. G.ShawR.BlaisdellA. P. (2001). Dynamic object perception by pigeons: Discrimination of action in video presentations. Animal Cognition, 4, 137–146.
10.
DecetyJ.GrèzesJ. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172–178.
11.
DittrichW. H.LeaS. E. G. (1993). Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 115–129.
12.
DittrichW. H.LeaS. E. G.BarrettJ.GurrP. R. (1998). Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: Visual concept discrimination and biological motion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 281–299.
13.
Fernández-JuricicE.ErichsenJ. T.KacelnikA. (2004). Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 25–31.
14.
GieseM. A.PoggioT. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179–192.
15.
GobbiniM. I.GentiliC.RicciardiE.BellucciC.SalviniP.LaschiC.. . . PietriniP. (2011). Distinct neural systems involved in agency and animacy detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1911–1920.
16.
HerrnsteinR. J.LovelandD. H.CableC. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285–305.
17.
JohanssonG. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model of its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.
18.
KobanA. C.CookR. G. (2009). Rotational object discrimination by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 250–265.
19.
MaltB. C.GennariS.ImaiM.AmeelE.TsudaN.MajidA. (2008). Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19, 232–240.
20.
MuiR.HaselgroveM.McGregorA.FutterJ.HeyesC.PearceJ. M. (2007). The discrimination of natural movement by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 371–380.
21.
ParronC.DeruelleC.FagotJ. (2007). Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 381–391.
22.
PolanaR.NelsonR. (1997). Detection and recognition of periodic, nonrigid motion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23, 261–282.
23.
ReesG. (2008). Vision: The evolution of change detection. Current Biology, 18, 40–42.
24.
RegolinL.TommasiL.VallortigaraG. (2000). Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Animal Cognition, 3, 53–60.
25.
RizzolattiG.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.
26.
ShipleyT.ZacksJ. (2008). Understanding events: From perception to action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
SingerJ. M.SheinbergD. L. (2010). Temporal cortex neurons encode articulated actions as slow sequences of integrated poses. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3133–3145.
28.
SumiS. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283–286.
29.
TomonagaM. (2001). Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 44, 46–59.
