A Power-Law Model of Psychological Memory Strength in Short- and Long-Term Recognition

Abstract

A classic law of cognition is that forgetting curves are closely approximated by power functions. This law describes relations between different empirical dependent variables and the retention interval, and the precise form of the functional relation depends on the scale used to measure each variable. In the research reported here, we conducted a recognition task involving both short- and long-term probes. We discovered that formal memory-strength parameters from an exemplar-recognition model closely followed a power function of the lag between studied items and a test probe. The model accounted for rich sets of response time (RT) data at both individual-subject and individual-lag levels. Because memory strengths were derived from model fits to choices and RTs from individual trials, the psychological power law was independent of the scale used to summarize the forgetting functions. Alternative models that assumed different functional relations or posited a separate fixed-strength working memory store fared considerably worse than the power-law model did in predicting the data.

Keywords

forgetting memory short-term memory power laws power functions forgetting curves response times

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

Schooler

L. J.

(1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396–408.

Anderson

J. R.

Tweney

R. D.

(1997). Artifactual power curves in forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 25, 724–730.

Atkinson

R. C.

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence

K. W.

Spence

J. T.

(Eds.), Advances in the psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 2. Research and theory (pp. 89–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Baddeley

A. D.

Hitch

G. J. L.

(1974). Working memory. In Bower

G. A.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Brown

G. D. A.

Neath

Chater

(2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.

Brown

S. D.

Heathcote

(2008). The simplest complete model of choice reaction time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153–178.

Cowan

(2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.

Crowder

R. G.

(1993). Short-term memory: Where do we stand? Memory & Cognition, 21, 142–145.

Donkin

Brown

S. D.

Heathcote

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 61–69.

10.

Kahana

M. J.

Sekuler

(2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177– 2192.

11.

Lee

M. D.

(2004). A Bayesian analysis of retention functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 310–321.

12.

McElree

(2006). Accessing recent events. In Ross

B. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

13.

Myung

Kim

Pitt

M. A.

(2000). Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 832–840.

14.

Nairne

J. S.

(2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.

15.

Nosofsky

R. M.

Little

D. R.

Donkin

Fific

(2011). Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review, 118, 280–315.

16.

Nosofsky

R. M.

Palmeri

T. J.

(1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266–300.

17.

Oberauer

(2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.

18.

Öztekin

Davachi

McElree

(2010). Are representations in working memory distinct from representations in long-term memory? Neural evidence in support of a single store. Psychological Science, 21, 1123–1133.

19.

Rouder

J. N.

Morey

R. D.

Cowan

Zwilling

C. E.

Morey

C. C.

Pratte

M. S.

(2008). An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 5975–5979.

20.

Shepard

R. N.

(1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.

21.

Wickelgren

W. A.

(1974). Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. Memory & Cognition, 2, 775–780.

22.

Wixted

J. T.

(2004). On common ground: Jost’s (1897) law of forgetting and Ribot’s (1881) law of retrograde amnesia. Psychological Review, 111, 864–879.

23.

Wixted

J. T.

Carpenter

S. K.

(2007). The Wickelgren power law and the Ebbinghaus savings function. Psychological Science, 18, 133–134.

24.

Wixted

J. T.

Ebbesen

E. B.

(1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2, 409–415.

25.

Wixted

J. T.

Ebbesen

E. B.

(1997). Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions. Memory & Cognition, 25, 731–739.

26.

Zhang

Luck

S. J.

(2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.20 MB