Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Judging the laterality of a hand seen at unanticipated orientations evokes a robust feeling of bodily movement, even though no movement is produced. In two experiments, we tested a novel hypothesis to explain this phenomenon: A hand’s laterality is determined via a multisensory binding of the visual representation of the seen hand and a proprioceptive representation of the observer’s felt hand, and the felt “movement” is an obligatory aftereffect of intersensory recalibration. Consistent with the predictions implied by such a cross-modal mechanism, our results in Experiment 1 showed that manipulating observers’ selective attention can evoke illusory feelings of movement in the “wrong” hand (i.e., the hand whose laterality does not match that of the stimulus). In Experiment 2, these illusions were readily extinguished in conditions in which binding was predicted to fail, a result indicating that cross-modal binding was necessary to produce them. These results are not explained by imagery, a mechanism widely assumed to account for how hand laterality is identified.

Keywords

motor processes perception human body decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barsalou

L. W.

(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Bonda

Petrides

Frey

Evans

(1995). Neural correlates of mental transformations of the body-in-space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 11180–11184.

Botvinick

Cohen

(1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.

Brainard

D. H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Buracas

G. T.

Boynton

G. M.

(2002). Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using M-sequences. NeuroImage, 16, 801–813.

Cooper

L. A.

Shepard

R. N.

(1975). Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 48–56.

Costantini

Haggard

(2007). The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 229–240.

Cousineau

(2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.

Decety

Grezes

(1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172–178.

10.

de Lange

F. P.

Helmich

R. C.

Toni

(2006). Posture influences motor imagery: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 33, 609–617.

11.

Ehrsson

H. H.

Holmes

N. P.

Passingham

R. E.

(2005). Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10564–10573.

12.

Ehrsson

H. H.

Spence

Passingham

R. E.

(2004). That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305, 875–877.

13.

Epstein

(1975). Recalibration by pairing: A process of perceptual learning. Perception, 4, 59–72.

14.

Funk

Brugger

(2008). Mental rotation of congenitally absent hands. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 81–89.

15.

Gentilucci

Daprati

Gangitano

(1998). Implicit visual analysis in handedness recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 478–493.

16.

Graziano

M. S.

(1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 10418–10421.

17.

Graziano

M. S.

Cooke

D. F.

Taylor

C. S.

(2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782–1786.

18.

Harris

C. S.

(1965). Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 72, 419–444.

19.

Held

(1965). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 213, 84–94.

20.

Ionta

Blanke

(2009). Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in left and right handers. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 207–217.

21.

Ionta

Fourkas

A. D.

Fiorio

Aglioti

S. M.

(2007). The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 1–7.

22.

Jeannerod

(2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109.

23.

Jeannerod

Frak

(1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735– 739.

24.

Kosslyn

S. M.

DiGirolamo

G. J.

Thompson

W. L.

Alpert

N. M.

(1998). Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology, 35, 151–161.

25.

Kosslyn

S. M.

Ganis

Thompson

W. L.

(2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642.

26.

Nico

Daprati

Rigal

Parsons

Sirigu

(2004). Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain, 127, 120–132.

27.

Parsons

L. M.

(1987). Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 178–241.

28.

Parsons

L. M.

(1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709–730.

29.

Parsons

L. M.

Fox

P. T.

Downs

J. H.

Glass

Hirsch

T. B.

Martin

C. C.

. . . Lancaster

J. L.

(1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375, 54–58.

30.

Pavani

Spence

Driver

(2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353–359.

31.

Pouget

Deneve

Duhamel

J. R.

(2002). A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 741–747.

32.

Radeau

Bertelson

(1977). Adaptation to auditory-visual discordance and ventriloquism in semirealistic situations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 22, 137–146.

33.

Sekiyama

(1982). Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 89–95.

34.

Shenton

J. T.

Schwoebel

Coslett

H. B.

(2004). Mental motor imagery and the body schema: Evidence for proprioceptive dominance. Neuroscience Letters, 370, 19–24.

35.

Shepard

R. N.

Cooper

L. A.

(1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Shepard

R. N.

Metzler

(1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

37.

Silva

Loubinoux

Olivier

Bataille

Fourcade

Samii

. . . Démonet

J. F.

(2011). Impaired visual hand recognition in preoperative patients during brachial plexus anesthesia: Importance of peripheral neural input for mental representation of the hand. Anesthesiology, 114, 126–134.

38.

Sirigu

Duhamel

J. R.

(2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 910–919.

39.

Stein

Meredith

(1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

Tsakiris

Haggard

(2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80–91.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

0.11 MB

Telling the Right Hand From the Left Hand

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material