Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although prejudice-reduction policies and interventions abound, is it possible that some of them result in the precise opposite of their intended effect—an increase in prejudice? We examined this question by exploring the impact of motivation-based prejudice-reduction interventions and assessing whether certain popular practices might in fact increase prejudice. In two experiments, participants received detailed information on, or were primed with, the goal of prejudice reduction; the information and primes either encouraged autonomous motivation to regulate prejudice or emphasized the societal requirement to control prejudice. Ironically, motivating people to reduce prejudice by emphasizing external control produced more explicit and implicit prejudice than did not intervening at all. Conversely, participants in whom autonomous motivation to regulate prejudice was induced displayed less explicit and implicit prejudice compared with no-treatment control participants. We outline strategies for effectively reducing prejudice and discuss the detrimental consequences of enforcing antiprejudice standards.

Keywords

motivation prejudice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amodio

D. M.

Harmon-Jones

Devine

P. G.

(2003). Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink responses and self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 738–753.

The Anti-Prejudice Consortium. (2011). Power over prejudice. Retrieved from http://poweroverprejudice.org/

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Blanchard

F. A.

Lilly

Vaughn

L. A.

(1991). Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 2, 101–105.

Brehm

S. S.

Brehm

J. W.

(1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Burton

K. D.

Lydon

J. E.

D’Alessandro

D. U.

Koestner

(2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750–762.

Cameron

Turner

R. N.

(2010). The application of diversity-based interventions to policy and practice. In Crisp

R. J.

(Ed.), The psychology of social and cultural diversity: Social issues and interventions (pp. 322–351). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada. (2011). Mathieu Da Costa Challenge and Racism. Stop it! Retrieved from http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/games/challenge.asp

deCharms

(1968). Personal causation. New York, NY: Academic Press.

10.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

11.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

12.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

13.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.

14.

Devine

P. G.

Plant

E. A.

Amodio

D. M.

Harmon-Jones

Vance

S. L.

(2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848.

15.

Gaertner

S. L.

Dovidio

J. F.

(1984). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

16.

Greenwald

A. G.

McGhee

D. E.

Schwartz

J. L. K.

(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

17.

Hansen

(2003). Diversity’s business case: Doesn’t add up. Workforce, 824, 28–32.

18.

Henry

P. J.

Sears

D. O.

(2002). The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283.

19.

Kawakami

Phills

C. E.

Steele

J. R.

Dovidio

J. F.

(2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: The impact of approach orientations on attitudes toward Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971.

20.

Legault

Green-Demers

Eadie

A. L.

(2009). When internalization leads to automatization: The role of self-determination in automatic stereotype suppression and implicit prejudice regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 10–24.

21.

Legault

Green-Demers

Grant

Chung

(2007). On the self-regulation of implicit and explicit prejudice: A self-determination perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 732–749.

22.

Page-Gould

Mendoza-Denton

Tropp

L. R.

(2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.

23.

Paluck

E. L.

Green

D. P.

(2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A critical look at evidence from the field and the laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367.

24.

Partners Against Hate. (2003). Addressing youthful hate crime is an imperative. Retrieved from http://www.partnersagainsthate.org/

25.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

26.

Phills

C. E.

Kawakami

Tabi

Nadolny

Inzlicht

(2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197–210.

27.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.

28.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486–501.

29.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

Peruche

M. B.

(2010). Routes to positive interracial interactions: Approaching egalitarianism or avoiding prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1135–1147.

30.

Sobel

M. E.

(1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In Leinhart

(Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Ironic Effects of Antiprejudice Messages

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material