KantartzisK.ImaiM.KitaS. (2011). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 575–586.
7.
LewkowiczD. J.GhazanfarA. A. (2009). The emergence of multisensory systems through perceptual narrowing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 470–478.
8.
LewkowiczD. J.TurkewitzG. (1980). Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology, 16, 597–607.
9.
MaurerD.PathmanT.MondlochC. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9, 316–322.
10.
MeltzoffA. N. (1990). Towards a developmental cognitive science: The implications of cross-modal matching and imitation for the development of representation and memory in infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 1–31.
11.
OhalaJ. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In HintonL.NicholsJ.OhalaJ. J. (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
OhalaJ. J. (1997). Sound symbolism. In Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL] (pp. 98–103). Seoul, South Korea: Linguistic Society of Korea.
13.
SapirE. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225–239.
14.
ShiR.WerkerJ. F.MorganJ. L. (1999). Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition, 72, B11–B21.
15.
ShultzT. R. (2007). The Bayesian revolution approaches psychological development. Developmental Science, 10, 357–364.