Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups. In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status. Our results suggest that cognitive abilities play a critical, albeit underappreciated, role in prejudice. Consequently, we recommend a heightened focus on cognitive ability in research on prejudice and a better integration of cognitive ability into prejudice models.

Keywords

cognitive ability intelligence right-wing ideology contact prejudice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel-Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Arbuckle

J. L.

(2006). Amos (Version 18.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Crisp

R. J.

Turner

R. N.

(2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240.

Deary

I. J.

Batty

G. D.

Gale

C. R.

(2008). Bright children become enlightened adults. Psychological Science, 19, 1–6.

Douglas

J. W. B.

(1964). The home and the school. London, England: Panther Books.

Dovidio

J. F.

Brigham

J. C.

Johnson

B. T.

Gaertner

S. L.

(1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In Macrae

C. N.

Stangor

Hewstone

(Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276–319). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

10.

Elliot

Murray

Pearson

(1978). British ability scales. Windsor, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.

11.

Furth

(1970). An inventory of Piaget’s developmental tasks. Washington, DC: Catholic University, Department of Psychology, Center for Research in Thinking and Language.

12.

Hodson

(2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159.

13.

Hodson

Choma

B. L.

Costello

(2009). Experiencing Alien-Nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 974–978.

14.

Hodson

Costello

(2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691–698.

15.

Hodson

Harry

Mitchell

(2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 509–525.

16.

Jackman

(1973). Education and prejudice or education and response-set? American Sociological Review, 38, 327–339.

17.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

18.

Keiller

S. W.

(2010). Abstract reasoning as a predictor of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 914–927.

19.

Kite

M. E.

Deaux

(1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 137–162.

20.

McCourt

Bouchard

T. J.

Lykken

D. T.

ellegen

Keyes

. (1999). Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 985–1014.

21.

Murphy

N. A.

Hall

J. A.

(2011). Intelligence and interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 39, 54–63.

22.

Ostapczuk

Musch

Moshagen

(2009). A randomized-response investigation of the education effect in attitudes toward foreigners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 920–931.

23.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

24.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.

25.

Richeson

J. A.

Shelton

J. N.

(2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287–290.

26.

Rokeach

(1948). Generalized mental rigidity as a factor in ethnocentrism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 259–277.

27.

Scarr

Weinberg

R. A.

(1981). The transmission of authoritarianism in families: Genetic resemblance in social-political attitudes? In Scarr

(Ed.), Race, social class, and individual differences (pp. 399–427). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Schoon

Cheng

Gales

C. R.

Batty

G. D.

Deary

I. J.

(2010). Social status, cognitive ability, and educational attainment as predictors of liberal social status and political trust. Intelligence, 38, 144–150.

29.

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 442–445.

30.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

31.

Sidanius

(1985). Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited. Political Psychology, 6, 637–661.

32.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Sidanius

Pratto

Bobo

(1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.

34.

Sniderman

Tetlock

P. E.

(1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129–150.

35.

Stankov

(2009). Conservatism and cognitive ability. Intelligence, 37, 294–304.

36.

Sturgis

Read

Allum

(2010). Does intelligence foster generalized trust? An empirical test using the UK birth cohort studies. Intelligence, 38, 45–54.

37.

Van Hiel

Onraet

De Pauw

(2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765–1799.

38.

Van Hiel

Pandelaere

Duriez

(2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837.

39.

Wagner

Schönbach

(1984). Links between educational status and prejudice: Ethnic attitudes in West Germany. In Brewer

M. B.

Miller

(Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 29–52). New York, NY: Academic Press.

40.

Wagner

Zick

(1995). The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity, and explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 41–56.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material