Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Is visual attention required for visual consciousness? In the past decade, many researchers have claimed that awareness can arise in the absence of attention. This claim is largely based on the notion that natural scene (or “gist”) perception occurs without attention. This article presents evidence against this idea. We show that when observers perform a variety of demanding, sustained-attention tasks, inattentional blindness occurs for natural scenes. In addition, scene perception is impaired under dual-task conditions, but only when the primary task is sufficiently demanding. This finding suggests that previous studies that have been interpreted as demonstrating scene perception without attention failed to fully engage attention and that natural-scene perception does indeed require attention. Thus, natural-scene perception is not a preattentive process and cannot be used to support the idea of awareness without attention.

Keywords

inattentional blindness dual tasks attention conscious awareness scenes gist

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

Franconeri

(2007). How many objects can you attentively track? Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13), Article 14. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/13/14/

Biederman

(1972). Perceiving real world scenes. Science, 177, 77–80.

Block

(1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 18, 227–247.

Block

(2005). Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 46–52.

Brainard

D. H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Crouzet

Kirchner

Thorpe

S. J.

(2010). Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 10(4), Article 16. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/4/16/

Evans

K. K.

Treisman

(2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1476–1492.

Fei-Fei

VanRullen

Koch

Perona

(2005). Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli. Visual Cognition, 12, 893–924.

Joseph

J. S.

Chun

M. M.

Nakayama

(1997). Attentional requirements in a “preattentive” feature search task. Nature, 387, 805–808.

10.

Kahneman

(1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

11.

Kirchner

Thorpe

S. J.

(2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762–1776.

12.

Koch

Tsuchiya

(2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22.

13.

Lamme

V. A.

(2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204–211.

14.

Lamme

V. A.

(2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention: A case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks, 17, 861–872.

15.

Lavie

(2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.

16.

VanRullen

Koch

Perona

(2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9596–9601.

17.

Mack

Rock

(1998). Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

18.

Marois

D.-J.

Chun

M. M.

(2004). The neural fate of perceived and missed events in the attentional blink. Neuron, 41, 464–472.

19.

Naccache

Blandin

Dehaene

(2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416–424.

20.

Naccache

Dehaene

(2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 215–229.

21.

Neisser

Becklen

(1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480–494.

22.

Norman

D. A.

Bobrow

D. G.

(1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.

23.

O’Regan

J. K.

Noë

(2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 939–973.

24.

Pelli

D. G.

(1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

25.

Posner

M. I.

(1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 7398–7403.

26.

Potter

M. C.

(1975). Meaning in visual scenes. Science, 187, 964–967.

27.

Pylyshyn

Storm

(1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 1–19.

28.

Rensink

R. A.

O’Regan

J. K.

Clark

J. J.

(1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.

29.

Rousselet

Fabre-Thorpe

Thorpe

(2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629–630.

30.

Rousselet

Thorpe

Fabre-Thorpe

(2004). Processing of one, two or four natural scenes in humans: The limits of parallelism. Vision Research, 44, 877–894.

31.

Serre

Oliva

Poggio

(2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 6424–6429.

32.

Simons

Levin

(1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267.

33.

Slagter

H. A.

Johnstone

Beets

I. A. M.

Davidson

R. J.

(2010). Neural competition for conscious representation across time: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 5(5), e10556. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0010556

34.

Theeuwes

Kramer

A. F.

Atchley

(1999). Attentional effects on preattentive vision: Spatial precues affect the detection of simple features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 341–347.

35.

Thorpe

S. J.

Fize

Marlot

(1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.

36.

Tononi

Koch

(2008). The neural correlates of consciousness: An update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 239–261.

37.

Treisman

Gelade

(1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

38.

Walker

Stafford

Davis

(2008). Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. Journal of Vision, 8(4), Article 21. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/4/21

39.

Wolfe

J. M.

(1999). Inattentional amnesia. In Coltheart

(Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

D.-J.

Woodman

G. F.

Widders

Marois

Chun

M. M.

(2004). Neural fate of ignored stimuli: Dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 992–996.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.89 MB

Natural-Scene Perception Requires Attention

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material