Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

American women still confront workplace barriers (e.g., bias against mothers, inflexible policies) that hinder their advancement at the upper levels of organizations. However, most Americans fail to recognize that such gender barriers still exist. Focusing on mothers who have left the workforce, we propose that the prevalent American assumption that actions are a product of choice conceals workplace barriers by communicating that opportunities are equal and that behavior is free from contextual influence. Study 1 reveals that stay-at-home mothers who view their own workplace departure as an individual choice experience greater well-being but less often recognize workplace barriers and discrimination as a source of inequality than do mothers who do not view their workplace departure as an individual choice. Study 2 shows that merely exposing participants to a message that frames actions in terms of individual choice increases participants’ belief that society provides equal opportunities and that gender discrimination no longer exists. By concealing the barriers that women still face in the workplace, this choice framework may hinder women’s long-term advancement in society.

Keywords

gender choice culture prejudice discrimination sociocultural factors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.

Belkin

(2003, October 26). The opt-out revolution. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/magazine/26WOMEN.html

Bennett

Ellison

Ball

(2010, March 18). Are we there yet? Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/2010/03/18/are-we-there-yet.html

Brescoll

V. L.

Okimoto

(2010). The price of power: Power-seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923–936.

Cuddy

A. J.

Fiske

S. T.

Glick

(2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718.

Eagly

A. H.

Carli

L. L.

(2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Fuegen

Biernat

Haines

Deaux

(2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737–754.

Iyengar

S. S.

Lepper

M. R.

(1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.

Janoff-Bulman

(1982). Esteem and control bases of blame: “Adaptive” strategies for victims versus observers. Journal of Personality, 50, 180–192.

10.

Jones

J. M.

(2005). Gender differences in views of job opportunity. Retrieved from the Gallup Web site: http://www.gallup.com/poll/17614/gender-differences-views-job-opportunity.aspx

11.

Lyness

K. S.

Heilman

M. E.

(2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.

12.

Major

Gramzow

R. H.

McCoy

S. K.

Levin

Schmader

Sidanius

(2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282.

13.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Murphy-Berman

Berman

(Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on self (pp. 1–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

14.

McCoy

S. T.

Major

(2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.

15.

O’Brien

L. T.

Major

(2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.

16.

Patall

E. A.

Cooper

Robinson

J. C.

(2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300.

17.

Percheski

(2008). Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73, 497–517.

18.

Ridgeway

C. L.

(2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

19.

Rowland

(1986). Women who do and women who don’t join the women’s movement: Issues for conflict and collaboration. Sex Roles, 14, 679–692.

20.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.

21.

Ryff

C. D.

(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

22.

Savani

Stephens

N. M.

Markus

H. R.

(2011). The unanticipated interpersonal and societal consequences of choice: Victim blaming and reduced support for the public good. Psychological Science, 22, 795–802.

23.

Schwartz

(2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

24.

Stephens

N. M.

Hamedani

M. G.

Markus

H. R.

Bergsieker

H. B.

Eloul

(2009). Why did they “choose” to stay? Perspectives of Hurricane Katrina observers and survivors. Psychological Science, 20, 878–886.

25.

Stone

(2007). Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

26.

Summers

L. H.

(2005, January). Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce. Retrieved from http://president.harvard.edu/speeches/summers_2005/nber.php

27.

Swim

J. K.

Aikin

K. J.

Hall

Hunter

B. A.

(1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.

28.

Vescio

T. K.

Gervais

S. J.

Snyder

Hoover

(2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.

29.

Wagener

J. J.

Taylor

S. E.

(1986). What else could I have done? Patients’ responses to failed treatment decisions. Health Psychology, 5, 481–496.

30.

Williams

J. C.

Manvell

Bornstein

(2006). “Opt out” or pushed out? How the press covers work/family conflict: The untold story of why women leave the workforce. Retrieved from http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/OptOutPushedOut.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material