CarrollN. (1996). The paradox of suspense. In VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualization, theoretical analysis, and empirical explorations (pp. 71–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C.KaufmanG. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327.
3.
MacDowellK.MandlerG. (1989). Constructions of emotion: Discrepancy, arousal, and mood. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 105–124.
4.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.
5.
Tal-OrN.CohenJ. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38, 402–418.
6.
VaughnL. A.ChildsK. E.MaschinskiC.NiñoN. P.EllsworthR. (2010). Regulatory fit, processing fluency, and narrative persuasion. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1181–1192.
7.
WinkielmanP.CacioppoJ. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000.
