Who Took the “×” out of Expectancy-Value Theory?

Abstract

Expectancy-value theory (EVT) is a dominant theory of human motivation. Historically, the Expectancy × Value interaction, in which motivation is high only if both expectancy and value are high, was central to EVT. However, the Expectancy × Value interaction mysteriously disappeared from published research more than 25 years ago. Using large representative samples of 15-year-olds (N = 398,750) from 57 diverse countries, we attempted to solve this mystery by testing Expectancy × Value interactions using latent-variable models with interactions. Expectancy (science self-concept), value (enjoyment of science), and the Expectancy × Value interaction all had statistically significant positive effects on both engagement in science activities and intentions of pursuing scientific careers; these results were similar for the total sample and for nearly all of the 57 countries considered separately. This study, apparently the strongest cross-national test of EVT ever undertaken, supports the generalizability of EVT predictions—including the “lost” Expectancy × Value interaction.

Keywords

motivation cross-cultural differences educational psychology science education statistical analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 1–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Arnold

H. J.

Evans

M. G.

(1979). Testing multiplicative models does not require ratio scales. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 41–59.

Atkinson

J. W.

(1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.

Blanton

Jaccard

(2006). Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 113, 155–166.

Busemeyer

J. R.

Jones

L. E.

(1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549–562.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

Cohen

(1978). Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858–866.

10.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414–417.

11.

Cronbach

L. J.

Snow

R. E.

(1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Oxford, England: Irvington.

12.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.

13.

Eccles (Parsons)

J. S.

(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviours. In Spence

J. T.

(Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

14.

Feather

N. T.

(1959). Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty. Psychological Review, 66, 150–164.

15.

Feather

N. T.

(1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In Feather

N. T.

(Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 395–420). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Kenny

D. A.

Judd

C. M.

(1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.

17.

Klein

A. G.

Moosbrugger

(2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.

18.

Marsh

H. W.

(1993). Relations between global and specific domains of self: The importance of individual importance, certainty, and ideals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 975–992.

19.

Marsh

H. W.

(2006). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.

20.

Marsh

H. W.

(2008). The elusive importance effect: More failure for the Jamesian perspective on the importance of importance in shaping self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 76, 1081–1121.

21.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K.-T.

(2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151–170.

22.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K.-T.

Wen

Nagengast

Morin

A. J. S.

(in press). Moderation. In Little

T. D.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

23.

Marsh

H. W.

Wen

Z. L.

Hau

K.-T.

(2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300.

24.

Marsh

H. W.

Wen

Nagengast

Hau

K.-T.

(in press). Structural equation models of latent interactions. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

25.

McClelland

G. H.

Judd

C. M.

(1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.

26.

Meece

J. L.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.

27.

Meredith

(1993). Measurement invariance, factor-analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

28.

Mitchell

T. R.

(1974). Expectancy models of job-satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: Theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1053–1077.

29.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2009). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

30.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris, France: Author.

31.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris, France: Author.

32.

Preacher

K. J.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.

33.

Rigdon

E. E.

Schumacker

R. E.

Wothke

(1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In Schumacker

R. E.

Marcoulides

G. A.

(Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

34.

Tolman

E. C.

(1938). The determiners of behavior at a choice point. Psychological Review, 45, 1–35.

35.

Tolman

E. C.

(1955). Principles of performance. Psychological Review, 62, 315–326.

36.

Wen

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K.-T.

(2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: An appropriate standardized solution and its scale-free properties. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 1–22.

37.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

38.

Wigfield

Tonks

Eccles

J. S.

(2004). Expectancy-value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In McInerney

D. M.

Etten

S. V.

(Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 165–198). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.15 MB

0.00 MB